You said 'forgotten' not us, i merely asked what you meant. As i was talking about WMD - i don't see why i would be referring specifically in that conversation to the First or Persian. I know it might be close to your heart, but it wasn't what the conversation was about.
It depends on what they mean. As a replacement for national armies? No. As a NATO-like organisation, then it might.
Why can't you accept someone else's opinion, i've already stated clearly to Tobes my reason why i voted, which is contrary to your opinions on cheating. A reasoning i've explained countless times over the last two and half years. People are allowed opinions different to yours! And as Duncs has asked how many more votes will be suffice for you?
You're allowed your opinion. I'm allowed to disagree with it and point out the inconsistencies. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from contradiction. Democracy doesn't end. One referendum doesn't suddenly kill it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36306681 "In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way." - Nigel Farage.
Inconsistencies, what would they be that my voting reasons don't fit with the general narratives, yet they get tarred with the general narratives. And that's been the problem all along. People assume why you voted, you must be racist, you must be right wing, you must be stupid, you want people to be poorer, you want people to suffer, the list is endless. It's like if you denounce something enough, you will get your own way. But then getting your own way is based on it's own lies, lies that didn't fit with why i actually voted.
