Well my comments re Saturday have been echoed on Facebook by Kevin Gallen. Actually he went further than I did. I wonder how many experts will be telling him that his comments are wrong?
What did he say?
Well my comments re Saturday have been echoed on Facebook by Kevin Gallen. Actually he went further than I did. I wonder how many experts will be telling him that his comments are wrong?
Here you go...
or this......
Just two of many on here and by all accounts he's had terrible abuse on other social media.
He's certainly having a bad time, and I would agree that he should be 'rested', but wouldn't you agree that to write off the career of a 24-year old who's suffering from a temporary loss of confidence is a tad over the top.
Talking of experts maybe I should learn the difference between Clive Allen and Kevin Gallen!What did he say?

You must log in or register to see images
Here you go...
or this......
Just two of many on here and by all accounts he's had terrible abuse on other social media.
He's certainly having a bad time, and I would agree that he should be 'rested', but wouldn't you agree that to write off the career of a 24-year old who's suffering from a temporary loss of confidence is a tad over the top.
He was partly at fault for the 2nd goal twice, by his poor clearing kick (one of many) straight to a Brentford player, then by going out for Cameron's balloon, hesitating as he does a lot, and getting caught neither collecting it or sticking.I have to say that in Lumley's defence, it was the defence or non existent defence that left him in the brown stuff. Goal 3..2 free headers...where was the marking? Goal 2 - if in doubt head it or wack it out. Don't put it in the air...that leaves you vulnerable. Goal 1 - should have been our free kick
I struggle to see who could have done better with a defence like that in front of them
So, would you like to have him in goal for us long term?
….Warburtons solution is oh I worked with Kelly once nice chap he will do. Can add Wallace, Ball and have a penalty Barbet to that list. Then players hasn't worked with but must be great cos they are with premier league clubs Amos, Smith and Mlakar then suddenly really need to question summer acquisitions. On the flip side some footy MW has got us playing has been amazing. Maybe we need a top scout system aka Brentford and leave MW to manage, not use his "contacts" to bring in very average players
I can think of Kelly, Barbet, Angel, Masterson, Cameron, Ball, Pugh who we bought last summer for next to nothing I believe (500k for Barbet, the rest free). Not bad at so little cost, and gave us both some needed experience, useful squad players, and in Masterson one for the future at least.I remain a huge Warburton fan but couldn't agree more about questionable transfers and transfer policy.
I'm still glass half full on the subject of Lumley (he's young and needs a break) and Kelly (he's had a decent game or two amongst the dross).
I can think of Kelly, Barbet, Angel, Masterson, Cameron, Ball, Pugh who we bought last summer for next to nothing I believe (500k for Barbet, the rest free). Not bad at so little cost, and gave us both some needed experience, useful squad players, and in Masterson one for the future at least.
I guess that's what Les and even more so Hoos are there for.I know he's not spent much but I'd worry a little about trusting him with any cash that we do have. It's his judgement on transfers that is a concern. Rangel and Cameron (and Wells) were known quantities from the previous season and were not identified by Warburton. It's too early to assess Masterson, I don't rate Pugh, the jury's out on Kelly, Kane can't defend, Barbet has decent games when he's not giving away penalties (which he does when he's been caught out), Smith is a dud, Mlakar hasn't made the grade, Wallace's first couple of appearances were a bit of a disaster (although he's improved in recent outings) and Amos often lets the game pass him by. I like Ball (except against Brentford) and both Barbet and Wallace could still come good.
I'm not saying it's a definite weakness but there's enough evidence to say that he shouldn't be allowed a free hand in transfers, especially when it comes to recruiting his "old boys". I certainly wouldn't trust him unsupervised with my life savings!
I know he's not spent much but I'd worry a little about trusting him with any cash that we do have. It's his judgement on transfers that is a concern. Rangel and Cameron (and Wells) were known quantities from the previous season and were not identified by Warburton. It's too early to assess Masterson, I don't rate Pugh, the jury's out on Kelly, Kane can't defend, Barbet has decent games when he's not giving away penalties (which he does when he's been caught out), Smith is a dud, Mlakar hasn't made the grade, Wallace's first couple of appearances were a bit of a disaster (although he's improved in recent outings) and Amos often lets the game pass him by. I like Ball (except against Brentford) and both Barbet and Wallace could still come good.
I'm not saying it's a definite weakness but there's enough evidence to say that he shouldn't be allowed a free hand in transfers, especially when it comes to recruiting his "old boys". I certainly wouldn't trust him unsupervised with my life savings!
What's up with not liking Pugh? From what I've seen he's decent, if not a world beater, and I imagine a good mentor for some of our younger attacking midfielders.
I guess that's what Les and even more so Hoos are there for.
Well we sent in increasing bids apparently late in the last window, for the Aberdeen CD, but stopped at £2.5 or £3 million when the last bid was rejected, and they were, so the rumours said, still demanding millions more. Maybe that was an example of the right processes and budget control being used, when everybody knew we really needed a competent CD. And still do....Yes, we have a sensible management structure, provided the right processes are followed and the right authorities applied. However, where a manager is allowed to bring in so many "old faces" that he knows, one worries that he has undue influence (Harry Redknapp anyone?). This is particularly true where our business model is meant to be based on developing young talent in house.