Right! Try again by posting this on the CORRECT thread
I can only give my personal opinion. To me football was lost in 1992 to what I saw as the lower classes to the game, from my own political point of view, this all started with Maggie Thatchers (social cleansing) war on football supporters. Also a continuous onslaught by many media outlets, who only ever wanted to publicise the ugly side of the game, and not the good it brought.
So it left a sour taste with me, when Murdoch came along with his SKY and bought the game lock, stock and smoking barrel - which was a bit rich considering his newspapers use to shhite on us every single week..
However, as I explained yesterday, I accepted it, the game now belonged to a new generation and the trappings that brings with it - New stadiums, decent football on TV, less violence, and although the lower leagues never really embraced it, we accepted it because we could see some of the benefits it was bringing and it wasn't a bad product.
Then Spurs like others before them, built their new (billion pound) stadium, and I thought time had come to say fook off to your own league, a European one, something I'd always been against, but these thoughts were due to the money only benefiting some, while pricing others out of the game, and by that I mean at the gate as well has teams going under.
They should have inititially allowed four, based on the four top placings of this years Premier League. To maintain your place in the league, you would have to either finish in the top four of your country league again OR win the Super League or any rules that created FAIR competition.
OH STOP! I just realised, we already have the above, it's called the Champions League.
