Off Topic Boxing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prehab26
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Thre we go. Out comes the snobbery

You're not a boxing follower though. You don't post on this thread regularly. Hence my comment. These big fights bright everyone out. Doesn't mean they understand scoring.
 
So all the ex pros and the experts are wrong and as usual you are right?
The 4 he lost were close. Cards sound harsh but doesn't mean corrupt. That's how scoring works.
Check out Bunce on Five Live Monday. He'll no doubt comment on the scoring.
Get where you're coming from though.
 
116-112 is only two rounds scored differently off a draw. It's not like it's a particularly wide decision.

Didn't watch it but pleased for Usyk.

yeh this. I think people seem to think it’s a wider margin than it is. It sounded to me like most rounds were incredibly close and all it takes is for two of those rounds to be given to Usyk over fury.
 
You're not a boxing follower though. You don't post on this thread regularly. Hence my comment. These big fights bright everyone out. Doesn't mean they understand scoring.
So, my credentials as a fan of boxing are defined solely by the regularity (or lack there of) of posts on this thread?
Dearie me
 
Perfectly fine, just astonished by your ongoing and overwhelming arrogance on almost every subject debated on here.

Not really mate. If I am proved wrong then you may have a point. If I am proved right, then I don't see it as arrogance, more accuracy.

Have a nice evening.
 
So, my credentials as a fan of boxing are defined solely by the regularity (or lack there of) of posts on this thread?
Dearie me

We can only judge what we see. You can not claim your a super fan when you never post on this thread.

Admit you're a casual and got it wrong. It's ok you know. Feel the pain mate. It's ok.
 
You're not a boxing follower though. You don't post on this thread regularly. Hence my comment. These big fights bright everyone out. Doesn't mean they understand scoring.
Mate I agree with your sentiments on the result and scoring but I don’t post on here much because I think boxing isn’t important to me anymore. I used to box a long time ago.
 
Not really mate. If I am proved wrong then you may have a point. If I am proved right, then I don't see it as arrogance, more accuracy.

Have a nice evening.
Everything you post these days is arrogant. You used to be a good poster but something changed and now you just seem to want t9 belittle the views and opinions of everyone who has an opposing view. Bordering on narcissism
 
Not really mate. If I am proved wrong then you may have a point. If I am proved right, then I don't see it as arrogance, more accuracy.

Have a nice evening.
Everything you post these days is arrogant. You used to be a good poster but something changed and now you just seem to want t9 belittle the views and opinions of everyone who has an opposing view. Bordering on narcissism
 
Everything you post these days is arrogant. You used to be a good poster but something changed and now you just seem to want t9 belittle the views and opinions of everyone who has an opposing view. Bordering on narcissism

Sound. No worries. You know where the ignore function is. I'll rather give my opinion straight to than be a complete melt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeamOfTalents
We can only judge what we see. You can not claim your a super fan when you never post on this thread.

Admit you're a casual and got it wrong. It's ok you know. Feel the pain mate. It's ok.
“Super fan”

:emoticon-0140-rofl::emoticon-0140-rofl:

go to bed , you’re embarrassing yourself