You're not a boxing follower though. You don't post on this thread regularly. Hence my comment. These big fights bright everyone out. Doesn't mean they understand scoring.
Perfectly fine, just astonished by your ongoing and overwhelming arrogance on almost every subject debated on here.
The 4 he lost were close. Cards sound harsh but doesn't mean corrupt. That's how scoring works. Check out Bunce on Five Live Monday. He'll no doubt comment on the scoring. Get where you're coming from though.
yeh this. I think people seem to think it’s a wider margin than it is. It sounded to me like most rounds were incredibly close and all it takes is for two of those rounds to be given to Usyk over fury.
So, my credentials as a fan of boxing are defined solely by the regularity (or lack there of) of posts on this thread? Dearie me
Not really mate. If I am proved wrong then you may have a point. If I am proved right, then I don't see it as arrogance, more accuracy. Have a nice evening.
So because someone isn't a "boxing follower" like yourself, they're called a "casual" and "shouldn't watch boxing". Okey dokey.
We can only judge what we see. You can not claim your a super fan when you never post on this thread. Admit you're a casual and got it wrong. It's ok you know. Feel the pain mate. It's ok.
Mate I agree with your sentiments on the result and scoring but I don’t post on here much because I think boxing isn’t important to me anymore. I used to box a long time ago.
Everything you post these days is arrogant. You used to be a good poster but something changed and now you just seem to want t9 belittle the views and opinions of everyone who has an opposing view. Bordering on narcissism
Everything you post these days is arrogant. You used to be a good poster but something changed and now you just seem to want t9 belittle the views and opinions of everyone who has an opposing view. Bordering on narcissism
Sound. No worries. You know where the ignore function is. I'll rather give my opinion straight to than be a complete melt.
