Board Meltdowns

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Which board kicks off first?

  • Liverpool

  • Man Utd

  • Swans

  • Saints

  • Hull


Results are only viewable after voting.
It is all going off on Sunderland board.

some want Fat Sam in, some won't touch him with a barge pole.

some want Peter Reid ! For ****s sake how desperate do you have to be to want him ?

anyway it's worth having a look at as the meltdown is in full swing

Hardly. Just the same plonker who kicks off with abuse everytime he posts. You know nothing of our meltdowns! They're epic. Today was just busy. I'll give you shout next big one. I'll probably be leading it. <ok>:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. J. McClure
We Arsenal fans are not in their league when it comes to In-Fighting, Beeling, Whinging, and WoeBetideUs !
I hope you are not referring to Sunderland fans with this post? Arsenal fans go into meltdown and fight over Wenger's future all the time..Goodness knows what you would be like if you had to endure the football we have had in recent years..
 
:emoticon-0169-dance
I hope you are not referring to Sunderland fans with this post? Arsenal fans go into meltdown and fight over Wenger's future all the time..Goodness knows what you would be like if you had to endure the football we have had in recent years..

Correct. We are Champions League at infighting etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrRAWhite
All you have to do is google it and you will get masses of information from many sources....I'm sure even a Porkie Pie such as yourself can manage that..



It's your figures and statements i'm interested in

The ones on your Clarkson thread… remember <ok>

The ones you fabricated out of thin air :emoticon-0181-fubar



He also denies that human activity has anything to do with global warming despite 100% of independent scientific research proving beyond any shadow of doubt that it does..That is another reason why I would gladly stick the nut on him..



Believe me when I say there is no doubt whatsoever..This is a subject very close to my heart and it is because of the undeniable evidence that I now back green policies..
The current spate of global warming is massively faster than anything else that has ever happened in the 4 billion years existence and is undoubtedly linked to the mass burning of carbon fuels starting from the industrial revolution..There is absolutely masses of data which proves this, and as I say, the only contradictory evidence has been offered by scientists sponsored by companies who have vested interest, and their evidence carries no weight whatsoever in scientific circles..
Human activity caused global warming is an absolute fact, and there is very little of real substance being done to combat it..



Must either be a buffoon or as I say is being sponsored to say this by rich companies with a vested interest...The evidence is undisputable and overwhelming..




Saying that your now down to 97% … are you going to correct these posts? :grin:





 
It's your figures and statements i'm interested in

The ones on your Clarkson thread… remember <ok>

The ones you fabricated out of thin air :emoticon-0181-fubar

Scientists who have come up with alternatives have usually been found to be sponsored by companies with a vested interest, hence the difference from the 100% and the 97% in the actual figures....Of course you will always get the odd rogue going against the overwhelming evidence just to make a name for themselves, but that of course is not what you are looking for..
PS..Enjoy your current stint of freedom...<whistle>
















Saying that your now down to 97% … are you going to correct these posts? :grin:




 


Scientists who have come up with alternatives have usually been found to be sponsored by companies with a vested interest, hence the difference from the 100% and the 97% in the actual figures....Of course you will always get the odd rogue going against the overwhelming evidence <doh> "Galileo Galilei" :emoticon-0126-nerd: just to make a name for themselves, but that of course is not what you are looking for..
PS..Enjoy your current stint of freedom…<whistle>
<laugh>

Flim-flam on bull5h1t… absolute nonsense… <doh>

I'm not surprised you tried to hide this reply whitey…<cool>
 
Last edited:
Scientists who have come up with alternatives have usually been found to be sponsored by companies with a vested interest, hence the difference from the 100% and the 97% in the actual figures....Of course you will always get the odd rogue going against the overwhelming evidence <doh> "Galileo Galilei" :emoticon-0126-nerd: just to make a name for themselves, but that of course is not what you are looking for..
PS..Enjoy your current stint of freedom…<whistle>
<laugh>

Flim-flam on bull5h1t… absolute nonsense… <doh>

I'm not surprised you tried to hide this reply whitey…<cool>
Do not pass go..Do not collect £200.
 
You might be able to bluff it at work… but you can't bluff it on the internet Whitey :grin:
My facts stand out way ahead of yours, in this argument and any others that we have had..You are infamous for your porkie pies, but the positive thing is that you will not be out too long if past form is to go by..