BBC606 v NOT606
I often wondered about the moderation at the BBC, totally innocent posts about opinions of the match or players being removed.
I always thought it was Mugs complaining just to be Trolls.
I think I may have been wrong, as more times than enough no mention of the Skunks was in the thread,
Thinking back it was when certain posters were losing an argument about their PET player or manager.
Usually out numbered they clearly were hitting the report button, to kill the thread.
Same as the ****ers on here who want to silence anyone that disagrees with them.
As they obviously have more knowledge than us mere mortal supporters, (Some of them actually claiming they do!) it is fine for them to hurl abuse or deride fellow Mackems, as they can't stop them posting. So they try and beat them down.
What's the betting any thread questioning Bruce on the BBC wouldn't have lasted to a second page?
Or there would be a dozen threads saying how we have never had it so good!
Anyone complaining wasn't beng realistic and a bad supporter, for wanting SAFC to improve year in year out.
How strange these same ones hurling all the abuse and derision, think it is fine for them to complain about players they don't like!
But thats them being constructive and not negative, and of course it doesn't make them BAD supporters and told to **** off and glory hunt elsewhere. (Unlike the fans they disagree with!)
Standing in the cold and wet watching **** football in the old 3rd division I had more belief than I do presently.
That is down to our tactically inept manager.
Some on here seem to have taken such a hardline, holier than thou stance backing Bruce, they totally blind themselves (or use rose tinted spectacles) to the fact football under Bruce has been **** for all these years. (A few games and lucky results excepted.) And it is only getting worse.
They made out anyone questioning Bruce or his tactics were part of some Brigade and not proper supporters, where as they themselves were above reproach.
But then the so called BIB's seem happy to put up with any old ****e and think fellow supporters being ambitious are being unrealistic.
IT is nice that some of the BIB's can stand their ground without making snide comments though.
Respect to them.
The rest of the abusers can expect it back in triplicate on here from me from now on, bollocks to detente.
Your knowledge of football is no better than mine (and in many cases less
) you want to hurl abuse at fellow Mackem's I for one am going to start returning it.
At least on NOT606 the cowardly ****ers can't hide behind that anonymous report button.
It must break their ****ing hearts!
Being joint 17th breaks mine!
I often wondered about the moderation at the BBC, totally innocent posts about opinions of the match or players being removed.
I always thought it was Mugs complaining just to be Trolls.
I think I may have been wrong, as more times than enough no mention of the Skunks was in the thread,
Thinking back it was when certain posters were losing an argument about their PET player or manager.
Usually out numbered they clearly were hitting the report button, to kill the thread.
Same as the ****ers on here who want to silence anyone that disagrees with them.
As they obviously have more knowledge than us mere mortal supporters, (Some of them actually claiming they do!) it is fine for them to hurl abuse or deride fellow Mackems, as they can't stop them posting. So they try and beat them down.
What's the betting any thread questioning Bruce on the BBC wouldn't have lasted to a second page?
Or there would be a dozen threads saying how we have never had it so good!
Anyone complaining wasn't beng realistic and a bad supporter, for wanting SAFC to improve year in year out.
How strange these same ones hurling all the abuse and derision, think it is fine for them to complain about players they don't like!
But thats them being constructive and not negative, and of course it doesn't make them BAD supporters and told to **** off and glory hunt elsewhere. (Unlike the fans they disagree with!)
Standing in the cold and wet watching **** football in the old 3rd division I had more belief than I do presently.
That is down to our tactically inept manager.
Some on here seem to have taken such a hardline, holier than thou stance backing Bruce, they totally blind themselves (or use rose tinted spectacles) to the fact football under Bruce has been **** for all these years. (A few games and lucky results excepted.) And it is only getting worse.
They made out anyone questioning Bruce or his tactics were part of some Brigade and not proper supporters, where as they themselves were above reproach.
But then the so called BIB's seem happy to put up with any old ****e and think fellow supporters being ambitious are being unrealistic.
IT is nice that some of the BIB's can stand their ground without making snide comments though.
Respect to them.
The rest of the abusers can expect it back in triplicate on here from me from now on, bollocks to detente.
Your knowledge of football is no better than mine (and in many cases less
) you want to hurl abuse at fellow Mackem's I for one am going to start returning it.At least on NOT606 the cowardly ****ers can't hide behind that anonymous report button.
It must break their ****ing hearts!
Being joint 17th breaks mine!
You'll be fine. There's definitely several teams worse than you, you'll come good.