BAME

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Des Head

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2011
2,670
3,551
113
Okay, I've only just found out what BAME means. Maybe I'm stupid, maybe I'm just naive, but isn't lumping everybody who isn't white into one group massively offensive? Isn't legally obliging every club to interview one BAME candidate unbelievably racist? Are we interviewing female applicants? Or disabled dudes? Or bald guys?

I can't imagine being black, because I'm not, and I'm sure that thanks to plenty of ****s in the western world it's more difficult than I could possibly imagine, but I can't imagine being happy that I was interviewed just because I tick a box. That would surely feel proper ****, and you're not guaranteed a job, just a ****ing chat.

Am I just an idiot or is nobody free to get the most fit person for the job, irregardless* of skin colour, sexuality or follicles?

Thoughts? Other than I'm a contentious white bald man?

*I know that's not really a word, Castro
 
Okay, I've only just found out what BAME means. Maybe I'm stupid, maybe I'm just naive, but isn't lumping everybody who isn't white into one group massively offensive? Isn't legally obliging every club to interview one BAME candidate unbelievably racist? Are we interviewing female applicants? Or disabled dudes? Or bald guys?

I can't imagine being black, because I'm not, and I'm sure that thanks to plenty of ****s in the western world it's more difficult than I could possibly imagine, but I can't imagine being happy that I was interviewed just because I tick a box. That would surely feel proper ****, and you're not guaranteed a job, just a ****ing chat.

Am I just an idiot or is nobody free to get the most fit person for the job, irregardless* of skin colour, sexuality or follicles?

Thoughts? Other than I'm a contentious white bald man?

*I know that's not really a word, Castro
You are all 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Des Head
You are not an idiot.
Just another example that the world has gone mad.
I despair.

I don't think the world's gome mad
You are not an idiot.
Just another example that the world has gone mad.
I despair.

We've not gone mad yet, but we may be on the way.

I have no issue with vacancies being open to everyone. I don't see why people should be excluded, or included, before they've proved their worth.

If Sol Campbell was our manager next season, and he was ****, it wouldn't be because he was black. If we got promoted, it wouldn't be because he was black.
 
Okay, I've only just found out what BAME means. Maybe I'm stupid, maybe I'm just naive, but isn't lumping everybody who isn't white into one group massively offensive? Isn't legally obliging every club to interview one BAME candidate unbelievably racist? Are we interviewing female applicants? Or disabled dudes? Or bald guys?

I can't imagine being black, because I'm not, and I'm sure that thanks to plenty of ****s in the western world it's more difficult than I could possibly imagine, but I can't imagine being happy that I was interviewed just because I tick a box. That would surely feel proper ****, and you're not guaranteed a job, just a ****ing chat.

Am I just an idiot or is nobody free to get the most fit person for the job, irregardless* of skin colour, sexuality or follicles?

Thoughts? Other than I'm a contentious white bald man?

*I know that's not really a word, Castro
Million % agree. The world’s gone ****ing mad.
 
Yeah, standard response to a racist dude. I ain't, so add to the discussion instead.
It's not obligated to give the job, just ' balances ' out (statistically) when looking at managers with similar qualifications and experiences , it was found that BME managers are less likely to be short listed / interviewed. My other comment was just sarcasm
 
The game should be looking at why they’re statistically less likely to be shortlisted rather than forcing at least one person to be shortlisted - it doesn’t solve the problem in the least bit.
I suspect the reason would be found to be ' institutional racism', so rather than change / challenge (attitude's) individuals , change behaviours hoping attitude's follow
 
I suspect the reason would be found to be ' institutional racism', so rather than change / challenge (attitude's) individuals , change behaviours hoping attitude's follow
Good points !.
You see a lot more Black American coaches in NFL and NBA over in America !
Take a look at European football and there isn't many at all !
I am surprised that we don't have more over here with the amount of different Nationalities we have playing here !!
 
I suspect the reason would be found to be ' institutional racism', so rather than change / challenge (attitude's) individuals , change behaviours hoping attitude's follow
But clubs will just have an extra name on the shortlist. It’ll have very little impact this way.
 
But clubs will just have an extra name on the shortlist. It’ll have very little impact this way.
Behavioural change does often take a long time to change culture (seat belts in cars) though does not always work (mobiles whilst driving) even with carrots or sticks. I wonder what you would suggest would help?
 
Behavioural change does often take a long time to change culture (seat belts in cars) though does not always work (mobiles whilst driving) even with carrots or sticks. I wonder what you would suggest would help?

If only it were that simple to help