Off Topic Are parents to blame

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Sounds like a minor issue in the context of raising a kid for twenty years.
Yep - my kids are both 27 now and still haven't asked me that question. I am hoping they have figured it out for themselves by now.

The dilemma would be no different to when do you decide to tell your kids they are adopted or were produced by in-vitro fertilisation.
 
I'd want my kids to be straight, but mainly because I want life to be easier for them. Certainly there are more hurdles and discrimnation to dodge if you're gay... I also want grandkids one day, preferably biological ..

Those are the only two reasons I'd prefer my kids to be straight... Beyond that it wouldn't bother me too much if they ended up being gay.

I want mine to be gay so I don't have grand kids, more of my ****ing money I can't spend on me!!!

In all seriousness can't disagree with anything you've said I pretty much feel the same
 
  • Like
Reactions: Milk not bear jizz
For the younger generation being such ****y *****s?

Scenario.
As I was getting my hair cut, I couldn't help over hearing the bloke in the seat waffling about simple things like.

Take the bus home don't walk (all off a mile)

Wear a long sleeve shift.

Don't forget to take a coat.

Don't forget your phone in case you need anything.

Your gran will meet you at the bus stop.

Etc, etc,etc.

Anyhow, as I was sat looking at Asian slut's, I thought oh he must be on about his daughter, protective father and all that.

But as it happens, he was talking about his 13 year old son. Ffs

What a ****ing fanny.

So are parents way way too over protective these days.

Are the kids soft as ****, partly due to the parents being massive fannies?


Mental, when I was 6 or 7 we played in old junk yards, and roamed free.

Today's helicopter parents are infantalising kids, they are maturing much later now, and it's very sad.

I think academia and the media play a big part, they have scared the **** out of parents in the past 30 years plus, psychology, so much bunk has people believing kids are fragile and delicate, they are nigh on indestructible, and infinitely more adaptive to adversity than adults, and they are evolved to be that way, being the future of the species and all that.

Remember, modern Germany was built by people we were kids in WWII in Germany...

I guess this guy in the barbers would be against those birds throwing nestlings out of the nest for their first flight <laugh>
You must log in or register to see images



I would say too that men working working working and handing over the raising of boys to women, at home and school, plays a part.

In Sweden and here in Finland, young boys are largely exclusively raised by women, especially Sweden, and it;s a nation of soy boy cucks

Doesn't take a genius to figure out, that boys can only be raised to me men, by men. This guy in the barbers, was imo raised primarily by women, who are genetically predisposed to protect and nurture. Boys don't need 24x7 protection and nurturing once they get to 6 or 7 years old
 
Last edited:
What goes missing in these "stranger danger" scenarios is that majority of kids actually get abducted by people they know

That's why the education is focused more on 'the lure' as many stangers are actually innocent friendly people, and as you mention many children that are abducted are done so by somebody known to them.
 
Mental, when I was 6 or 7 we played in old junk yards, and roamed free.

Today's helicopter parents are infantalising kids, they are maturing much later now, and it's very sad.

I think academia and the media play a big part, they have scared the **** out of parents in the past 30 years plus, psychology, so much bunk has people believing kids are fragile and delicate, they are nigh on indestructible, and infinitely more adaptive to adversity than adults, and they are evolved to be that way, being the future of the species and all that.

Remember, modern Germany was built by people we were kids in WWII in Germany...

I guess this guy in the barbers would be against those birds throwing nestlings out of the nest for their first flight <laugh>
You must log in or register to see images



I would say too that men working working working and handing over the raising of boys to women, at home and school, plays a part.

In Sweden and here in Finland, young boys are largely exclusively raised by women, especially Sweden, and it;s a nation of soy boy cucks

Doesn't take a genius to figure out, that boys can only be raised to me men, by men. This guy in the barbers, was imo raised primarily by women, who are genetically predisposed to protect and nurture. Boys don't need 24x7 protection and nurturing once they get to 6 or 7 years old


<laugh>

Cause throughout time it's always been the men raising the children <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Some kid was told "don't talk to strangers" pretty sound advice for everyone, young and old. Then the kid is terrified of everything and can't sleep. The kid is a pussy.

lol tbf that is dumb. However if they still use this video:

There were stark warnings such as: "You don't want to end up dead or in hospital, say 'No' to strangers!"

no surprises the kids might get scared <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Some kid was told "don't talk to strangers" pretty sound advice for everyone, young and old. Then the kid is terrified of everything and can't sleep. The kid is a pussy.

I think that's part of the reason for the beware of 'the lure' advice instead of demonising all strangers.
To be fair, I can see why a 5 year old kid might get scared of strangers, if all the adults around them say 'don't trust strangers'
 
lol tbf that is dumb. However if they still use this video:

There were stark warnings such as: "You don't want to end up dead or in hospital, say 'No' to strangers!"

no surprises the kids might get scared <laugh>

Exactly.
 

<laugh>

Cause throughout time it's always been the men raising the children <laugh>


Nope, not true.

Throughout time young boys went to work in the fields with their fathers, learned their trades from their fathers, learned to fight with a sword with their fathers, and if they belonged to a house of note, they were sent away as wards to be educated and taught in the marital arts, to be toughened up.

If you were a teen, even only 13, and your father died, you were the head of the house.

I suggest you learn what life was like in 16th century England for a start, then look at Germanic society in Roman times, and Roman history itself.

Women raised babies and very young kids, but once boys became 6 or 7, not so, in general.

It's like you never read a history book. <laugh>
@PISKIE likes bogus history :bandit:

Want an example of modern parallel where men are absent from raising their boys? US Black inner cities, where 75% of families are single moms, and look at the state of those cities, the gangs the crime.. all driven by absent fathers. Unlike Sweden. in those US cities, the parents cannot offload the kid into the care of state paid women in the care/edu system until they are in their late teens, thus producing maladjusted cucks


Interesting thing, a huge number of Finnish and Swedish males grow up into maladjusted men.
 
Last edited:
Nope, not true.

Throughout time young boys went to work in the fields with their fathers, learned their trades from their fathers, learned to fight with a sword with their fathers, and if they belonged to a house of note, they were sent away as wards to be educated and taught in the marital arts, to be toughened up.

If you were a teen, even only 13, and your father died, you were the head of the house.

I suggest you learn what life was like in 16th century England for a start, then look at Germanic society in Roman times, and Roman history itself.

Women raised babies and very young kids, but once boys became 6 or 7, not so, in general.

It's like you never read a history book. <laugh>
@PISKIE likes bogus history :bandit:

Want an example of modern parallel where men are absent from raising their boys? US Black inner cities, where 75% of families are single moms, and look at the state of those cities, the gangs the crime.. all driven by absent fathers. Unlike Sweden. in those US cities, the parents cannot offload the kid into the care of state paid women in the care/edu system until they are in their late teens.

Moving the bar geezer. You said boys were softcocks nowadayd and fragile because they are raised by women.

How is that relevant to inner city youths with no father figure who most probably aggressive and violent thus debunking your argument.

Lastly from probably about the 60s onwards (im assuming you are talking about the soft entitled youths of the millenial generation ans above) im pretty sure kids werent going to work with their dads and were raised by women
 
Moving the bar geezer. You said boys were softcocks nowadayd and fragile because they are raised by women.

How is that relevant to inner city youths with no father figure who most probably aggressive and violent thus debunking your argument.

Lastly from probably about the 60s onwards (im assuming you are talking about the soft entitled youths of the millenial generation ans above) im pretty sure kids werent going to work with their dads and were raised by women


"Boys don't need 24x7 protection and nurturing once they get to 6 or 7 years old"

I clearly gave an age range and have been consistent. Fail

Raised by women only from birth to adulthood = cucks on average, can't learn to be a man from women.
Without a state apparatus of cuckery, women can't handle boys once they get to their teens if there are no fathers around (on average)