Yep - my kids are both 27 now and still haven't asked me that question. I am hoping they have figured it out for themselves by now. The dilemma would be no different to when do you decide to tell your kids they are adopted or were produced by in-vitro fertilisation.
I want mine to be gay so I don't have grand kids, more of my ****ing money I can't spend on me!!! In all seriousness can't disagree with anything you've said I pretty much feel the same
Everybody being very PC whilst nit wanting their kid to be gay Is it homophobic to say the thought of your lad sucking cock is minging?
This is why I say us blokes are not homophobic for not wanting our son's to be gay We don't want our girls to be getting dicked either That's consistency and fairness
Look at the ****ing state of this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-45813069 Is it just me or is this ridiculous? Parents to blame that kids are massive pussies?
What goes missing in these "stranger danger" scenarios is that majority of kids actually get abducted by people they know
Mental, when I was 6 or 7 we played in old junk yards, and roamed free. Today's helicopter parents are infantalising kids, they are maturing much later now, and it's very sad. I think academia and the media play a big part, they have scared the **** out of parents in the past 30 years plus, psychology, so much bunk has people believing kids are fragile and delicate, they are nigh on indestructible, and infinitely more adaptive to adversity than adults, and they are evolved to be that way, being the future of the species and all that. Remember, modern Germany was built by people we were kids in WWII in Germany... I guess this guy in the barbers would be against those birds throwing nestlings out of the nest for their first flight please log in to view this image I would say too that men working working working and handing over the raising of boys to women, at home and school, plays a part. In Sweden and here in Finland, young boys are largely exclusively raised by women, especially Sweden, and it;s a nation of soy boy cucks Doesn't take a genius to figure out, that boys can only be raised to me men, by men. This guy in the barbers, was imo raised primarily by women, who are genetically predisposed to protect and nurture. Boys don't need 24x7 protection and nurturing once they get to 6 or 7 years old
That's why the education is focused more on 'the lure' as many stangers are actually innocent friendly people, and as you mention many children that are abducted are done so by somebody known to them.
Some kid was told "don't talk to strangers" pretty sound advice for everyone, young and old. Then the kid is terrified of everything and can't sleep. The kid is a pussy.
lol tbf that is dumb. However if they still use this video: There were stark warnings such as: "You don't want to end up dead or in hospital, say 'No' to strangers!" no surprises the kids might get scared
I think that's part of the reason for the beware of 'the lure' advice instead of demonising all strangers. To be fair, I can see why a 5 year old kid might get scared of strangers, if all the adults around them say 'don't trust strangers'
Nope, not true. Throughout time young boys went to work in the fields with their fathers, learned their trades from their fathers, learned to fight with a sword with their fathers, and if they belonged to a house of note, they were sent away as wards to be educated and taught in the marital arts, to be toughened up. If you were a teen, even only 13, and your father died, you were the head of the house. I suggest you learn what life was like in 16th century England for a start, then look at Germanic society in Roman times, and Roman history itself. Women raised babies and very young kids, but once boys became 6 or 7, not so, in general. It's like you never read a history book. @PISKIE likes bogus history Want an example of modern parallel where men are absent from raising their boys? US Black inner cities, where 75% of families are single moms, and look at the state of those cities, the gangs the crime.. all driven by absent fathers. Unlike Sweden. in those US cities, the parents cannot offload the kid into the care of state paid women in the care/edu system until they are in their late teens, thus producing maladjusted cucks Interesting thing, a huge number of Finnish and Swedish males grow up into maladjusted men.
Moving the bar geezer. You said boys were softcocks nowadayd and fragile because they are raised by women. How is that relevant to inner city youths with no father figure who most probably aggressive and violent thus debunking your argument. Lastly from probably about the 60s onwards (im assuming you are talking about the soft entitled youths of the millenial generation ans above) im pretty sure kids werent going to work with their dads and were raised by women
"Boys don't need 24x7 protection and nurturing once they get to 6 or 7 years old" I clearly gave an age range and have been consistent. Fail Raised by women only from birth to adulthood = cucks on average, can't learn to be a man from women. Without a state apparatus of cuckery, women can't handle boys once they get to their teens if there are no fathers around (on average)