Andy Carroll

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Who knows. I have a lot of Irish family and they have quite an excitable temperament. Its unlikely but not impossible that this Paddy Cummins took a "**** off" from Andy Carroll badly. The West Ham statement does afterall say that he had to be "restrained".

I dont know if it will go to court or not. The Sun obviously couldnt find any other eye witness' as I am sure they would have used them for the story. If It does just remain our word against theirs then we certainly wont ever know.

I maintain that if Carrol and his people had requested no more photos and the reporter repeatedly ignored that request, then Carrol was within his rights to act.

And we still dont know about any eye gouging. If he has grabbed his face and caught his eye then thats life.

Can't condone what has happened, but none of my business really, do you think he will become a full time WHU player, can't see Liverpool wanting to keep him.
 
I feel like I should correct this, because when you end up beating some poor sod up under the misapprehension that "it's your right" then you're going to get in trouble. It really isn't. And Carroll's lucky you're not his lawyer.

There is really no excuse for Carroll doing anything because, as I've said, he had a team of security personnel around him who could deal with this guy. And they did, as the statement says they "restrained" him, but not from attacking Carroll, from taking more pictures obviously.

Oh and having a few Irish family doesn't give you the right to characterise the Irish as a bunch of violent idiots.

Yes it probably is a good job I am not his lawyer. I am woefully under qualified afterall.

I am not talking from a legal perspective. I am talking about how things work in real life.

If this photographer has ignored repeated requests to stop taking photos then **** him. You can tell by his smarmy little face what a wind up he was probably being. What did he think was going to happen?

Family gatherings in Ireland are usually lively affairs is all I am saying. Of course not all Irishmen are violent. That would be a ridiculous generalisation. But a fair few can get quite excitable as I have experienced and the only reason I bought that up was because you seemed to think it was absurd to suggest that the 5" 8" Irish photographer could have been the one kicking off.

You and I are clearly from different walks of life. I think if someone contiues to be disrespectful and wont listen then you have the right to stand up for yourself. What do you think he should have done? Call the police? I am not a violent person at all but I I think it is acceptable give the bloke a clump if he was being a persistant nuisance.

Eye gouging is unpleasant but I am not sure this even happened and if it did, I would guess it was more a grab of the face during a scuffle rather than an intentional attack on the blokes eyeball.

Anyway I'm gonna leave it that.
 
Firstly, the law applies to real life. So you'd better get used to learning how real life actually works before you find yourself on the wrong side of it.

Secondly, again, I think he should have let the security professionals do their job and deal with this guy. Carroll had no need to do anything.
 
ehhh... I don't know. I sort of agree with Trixter. Some people deserve a punch in the face, so I'm not very sympathetic to the cameraman. On the other hand, people over the age of 12 should know that punching someone is not the right thing to do either, and there are better ways to handle it. Just because someone might deserve a punch in the face doesn't mean you should give them one.

As far as this individual incident is concerned, it doesn't seem like a huge deal. But let's be real, it probably doesn't happen if Carroll isn't piss drunk. And Carroll being piss drunk and doing something stupid and violent yet again is a problem. He needs to get some help for his anger/alcohol issues and if he won't do it voluntarily I have no problem with the court sentencing him to a short prison stay or rehab to get the message across.
 
ehhh... I don't know. I sort of agree with Trixter. Some people deserve a punch in the face, so I'm not very sympathetic to the cameraman. On the other hand, people over the age of 12 should know that punching someone is not the right thing to do either, and there are better ways to handle it. Just because someone might deserve a punch in the face doesn't mean you should give them one.

As far as this individual incident is concerned, it doesn't seem like a huge deal. But let's be real, it probably doesn't happen if Carroll isn't piss drunk. And Carroll being piss drunk and doing something stupid and violent yet again is a problem. He needs to get some help for his anger/alcohol issues and if he won't do it voluntarily I have no problem with the court sentencing him to a short prison stay or rehab to get the message across.

I've always imagined that, if I was famous and being followed around by cameramen, I'd probably end up punching one. But I'd take a punishment for that, and I'd deserve it too.
 
I've always imagined that, if I was famous and being followed around by cameramen, I'd probably end up punching one. But I'd take a punishment for that, and I'd deserve it too.

But if you had a team of security guards with you? If you're on your own then I can sympathise to a small extent, but if you have people with you who are employed to keep you out of trouble (and other people out of your way) then there is no conceivable excuse for acting yourself.
 
But if you had a team of security guards with you? If you're on your own then I can sympathise to a small extent, but if you have people with you who are employed to keep you out of trouble (and other people out of your way) then there is no conceivable excuse for acting yourself.

I'd probably be annoyed with them for making me need security guards. Besides, the paparazzi method of journalism is a moral grey area, and the legality of it is always being debated. I personally don't think the current law has got it right, and I think it should amount to harassment. I'm not saying acting yourself would be the right thing to do, but we all do the wrong thing now and again, especially when we're in a bad mood. I probably wouldn't be able to help myself.
 
Firstly, the law applies to real life. So you'd better get used to learning how real life actually works before you find yourself on the wrong side of it.

Secondly, again, I think he should have let the security professionals do their job and deal with this guy. Carroll had no need to do anything.

Thank you for that Inspector Sensible.

Don't worry. I am not about to embark on a life of crime just because I said some whiney little photographer deserved a clump!
 
Can't condone what has happened, but none of my business really, do you think he will become a full time WHU player, can't see Liverpool wanting to keep him.

A well clued up ITK on kumb has said we do want to sign him but his form will have to improve considerably if we are going to consider paying anything like 17m for him.

If we can get him for a sensible fee he will be a superb signing for us. He has been on a bit of a drought since joining but has been playing well and the goals will come I am sure.

He clearly likes a drink and its fair to say he is a bit wild but he comes across well when interviewed and I am sure he will calm down.

Sign him up I say.
 
A well clued up ITK on kumb has said we do want to sign him but his form will have to improve considerably if we are going to consider paying anything like 17m for him.

If we can get him for a sensible fee he will be a superb signing for us. He has been on a bit of a drought since joining but has been playing well and the goals will come I am sure.

He clearly likes a drink and its fair to say he is a bit wild but he comes across well when interviewed and I am sure he will calm down.

Sign him up I say.


Not sure about that T. Don't think anyone on kumb can be described as clued up!:confused::biggrin:
 
Thank you for that Inspector Sensible.

Don't worry. I am not about to embark on a life of crime just because I said some whiney little photographer deserved a clump!

Ha ha - Inspector Sensible, i like that Trixter ! ' So you'd just better get used to learning how real life actually works... ' - ffs, PTF is so full of his own p... and importance !!
 
Yes it probably is a good job I am not his lawyer. I am woefully under qualified afterall.

I am not talking from a legal perspective. I am talking about how things work in real life.

If this photographer has ignored repeated requests to stop taking photos then **** him. You can tell by his smarmy little face what a wind up he was probably being. What did he think was going to happen?

Family gatherings in Ireland are usually lively affairs is all I am saying. Of course not all Irishmen are violent. That would be a ridiculous generalisation. But a fair few can get quite excitable as I have experienced and the only reason I bought that up was because you seemed to think it was absurd to suggest that the 5" 8" Irish photographer could have been the one kicking off.

You and I are clearly from different walks of life. I think if someone contiues to be disrespectful and wont listen then you have the right to stand up for yourself. What do you think he should have done? Call the police? I am not a violent person at all but I I think it is acceptable give the bloke a clump if he was being a persistant nuisance.

Eye gouging is unpleasant but I am not sure this even happened and if it did, I would guess it was more a grab of the face during a scuffle rather than an intentional attack on the blokes eyeball.

Anyway I'm gonna leave it that.

I've been to Hammer country and I'd be kicking and punching as well to get out to the real world....
 
Know that for sure do you?

The West Ham statement says it was in fact the photographer who had to be restrained.

Our word against theirs. We will probably never know the truth but that doesn't automatically mean Andy Carrol was in the wrong

If I was famous and I had been being photographed all night and I asked them to stop, I would be pretty annoyed if they carried on. If they then carried on after being told again and again then I'm pretty sure that I, like most would give the sad little bloke a slap.

Strewth mate you do talk a load of codswallop at times.......If you become famous it stands to reason that you are going to be photographed where ever you are and have to accept that. No doubt it can be annoying but it goes as they say with the territory.
No one has a right to use violence to another no matter what the circumstances. No doubt if you had been thumped you would have to be restrained from hitting back too.
Most likely he had a skin full and did not want to have his antics photographed for people to see at home. Tough......and just for the record I would say exactly the same if one of ours did something similar.
Justifying violence because he asked for it is a load of rubbish and I can assure you that no reporter or photographer ever would start a fight!! (At least while on duty anyway)

You can defend someones actions of drunken behaviour if you choose to, but to the majority....Including your own fans, they will be disgusted and will find it indefensible.
 
Ha ha - Inspector Sensible, i like that Trixter ! ' So you'd just better get used to learning how real life actually works... ' - ffs, PTF is so full of his own p... and importance !!
It's one of the nicer things that's been said about me recently to be fair.

Dman you seem to be becoming as obsessed with me as that LauraB person is with Boruc!
 
Strewth mate you do talk a load of codswallop at times.......If you become famous it stands to reason that you are going to be photographed where ever you are and have to accept that. No doubt it can be annoying but it goes as they say with the territory.
No one has a right to use violence to another no matter what the circumstances. No doubt if you had been thumped you would have to be restrained from hitting back too.
Most likely he had a skin full and did not want to have his antics photographed for people to see at home. Tough......and just for the record I would say exactly the same if one of ours did something similar.
Justifying violence because he asked for it is a load of rubbish and I can assure you that no reporter or photographer ever would start a fight!! (At least while on duty anyway)

You can defend someones actions of drunken behaviour if you choose to, but to the majority....Including your own fans, they will be disgusted and will find it indefensible.

To quote fMLSc. "Just because punchups happen every week, doesn't make it right".

By the same token, just because paparazzi photographers behave like this every week and don't allow celebrities a moments privacy - doesn't "make it right".

This supposedly occurred in the early hours of the morning. I would imagine Carrol had been being photographed all night without complaint. Understandably there came a point when he would have said "enoughs enough".

If the little weasel faced snapper couldn't respect that and continued to ignore requests then **** him. I would have given him a slap too.
 
To quote fMLSc. "Just because punchups happen every week, doesn't make it right".

By the same token, just because paparazzi photographers behave like this every week and don't allow celebrities a moments privacy - doesn't "make it right".

This supposedly occurred in the early hours of the morning. I would imagine Carrol had been being photographed all night without complaint. Understandably there came a point when he would have said "enoughs enough".

If the little weasel faced snapper couldn't respect that and continued to ignore requests then **** him. I would have given him a slap too.

Fair enough...... so you wouldn't complain then if charges were brought and you were sent down for a while. You would say that it was a fair cop?
I can't see it myself you would still say he deserved it....he was wrong and you were right. Just because you felt like it.....No mate somehow you need to be a bit more controlled in your thought process........The consequences just are not worth the risk.....Mind you no doubt you do not think that there would be consequences for your actions. He will be very lucky if he is not brought to book about this. Very lucky indeed....but hey sometimes there is no justice in the world.