Off Topic And Now for Something Completely Different

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
That's what we used to do pre Brexit - the Dublin convention allowed return to the EU country that asylum seekers had left from; that's why so few came here pre Brexit, it was a waste of time and money paying smugglers to get them to the UK only to be given a cup of tea and then sent straight back.

A bit of a myth, it's believed the number of people who've arrived in boats now exceeds 100,000 and the grand total of people returned under the Dublin Agreement was only 209 (far more have drowned attempting the crossing, than were ever returned).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk
And that's all part of why there isn't one easy simple answer.
But for me the article touched on at least some of the really obvious, logical answers.
The one thing the article and countless other debates over immigration, and the housing problems caused by it,fail to mention, is the homelessness we already have in our Country?
 
A bit of a myth, it's believed the number of people who've arrived in boats now exceeds 100,000 and the grand total of people returned under the Dublin Agreement was only 209 (far more have drowned attempting the crossing, than were ever returned).
Less than 209 have died attempting to cross the Channel - at least of those recorded
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...of-migrant-channel-crossing-deaths-since-2019

More have died crossing the Mediterranean and Aegean Seas
 
The one thing the article and countless other debates over immigration, and the housing problems caused by it,fail to mention, is the homelessness we already have in our Country?
Isnt a large part of the problem of sleeping rough because drug takers and heavy drinkers and those with pets have difficulty getting accommodation meant for homeless people?
 
Less than 209 have died attempting to cross the Channel - at least of those recorded
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...of-migrant-channel-crossing-deaths-since-2019

More have died crossing the Mediterranean and Aegean Seas

55 are known to have drowned between 2019 and now, but there's believed to be others they're not aware of and there's been around 300 who've died trying to cross the channel in the twenty years up to 2019 (though I think they include swimmers who didn't make it, rather than just immigrants).
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
If only it was that simple, turn up wirh no ID claim to be mohamid fleeing the war in Syria, looking suspiciously like someone from the African continent. Need to be housed whilst being processed but object to all accommodation offered aided and abetted by human rights lawyers paid for by the legal aid system. And that's just the start, the time taken to find out who you really are takes ages (if possible at all) The deportation is also appealed in the courts again the lawyers are the one making the most out of it.
Its not an enviable task trying to come up with a solution.
How come we could manage to process around that many over a decade ago? (most incoming annually up to 2022 was actually in 2002…but they got processed quickly then)
The reason they don’t is that the Govt don’t want to.
Jenrick said that the other day.
They want to hold people for a long time to, in the Govt’s words, make coming less appealing.
That’s fine I suppose, not what I’d do but there is some logic I suppose even though it doesn’t seem to be working does it, but if you deliberately hold people without processing them then you need to put them somewhere…which is where we are now.
We get less coming than we used to (perhaps more this year, we’ll see when the stats are released) but have to spend a fortune housing them because they have decided to do exactly that…knowing the cost.
Some might think it’s also so that immigration is important to more people come election time, but there is no actual evidence of that (unlike the evidence that putting people up in hotels because they deliberately take longer than needed to process them is what they are aiming for)

You must log in or register to see media
 
A bit of a myth, it's believed the number of people who've arrived in boats now exceeds 100,000 and the grand total of people returned under the Dublin Agreement was only 209 (far more have drowned attempting the crossing, than were ever returned).
I wonder how many are economic migrants from the likes of Albania and Rumania, if the processing was up to speed, those could be deported quick smart, as for the rest there will be thousands willing to do the jobs our lazy idle benefit scrounging ukip voting scum won’t do, and when you hear why are they all men? I saw an interview with a very intelligent Syrian, he said it cost him about £3000 to get on a boat, if he can get asylum in the UK he could then bring his wife and kids over, he said it’s far too dangerous and expensive to try get across Europe with them as well.
 
I wonder how many are economic migrants from the likes of Albania and Rumania, if the processing was up to speed, those could be deported quick smart, as for the rest there will be thousands willing to do the jobs our lazy idle benefit scrounging ukip voting scum won’t do, and when you hear why are they all men? I saw an interview with a very intelligent Syrian, he said it cost him about £3000 to get on a boat, if he can get asylum in the UK he could then bring his wife and kids over, he said it’s far too dangerous and expensive to try get across Europe with them as well.
Processing won’t be ‘up to speed’ because the Govt have decided they want to deliberately delay it…to make it slower than it was a decade or so ago.
Deliberately
By choice
…they want it to be that way
 
Didnt there used to be flags at the half way line at football matches
not on the touchline but about a yard away
I dont see the point really
 
Didnt there used to be flags at the half way line at football matches
not on the touchline but about a yard away
I dont see the point really

To be honest the corner flags serve no real purpose.

Other than to get in the way of the player taking the corner.

And occasionally having a slow ball bounce off back of it into play, when a defender is trying to shepard it out. Which always raises a cheer.
 
To be honest the corner flags serve no real purpose.

Other than to get in the way of the player taking the corner.

And occasionally having a slow ball bounce off back of it into play, when a defender is trying to shepard it out. Which always raises a cheer.
If the flag wasnt there the corner kicker could disguise whether it's an inswinger or outswinger