So, speaking as someone who was 13 at the time and with reference to the Beatles, whose fans weren't 10 and 11 at that time what has 10 and 11 year olds got to do with it? Other than you are a silly ****?
I didn't mention the Beatles or eleven year olds. It was just a general comment referring to the era you used. I was 9 or 10 in 1963 and I liked The Beatles, so did my mates. Why the abuse? For a clever man you really are ducking stupid.
So, what has 9 and 10 year olds to do with a post about teenagers? Except in your alternative universe.
Having reread your post it still comes across as a post about 1963 and your observations of that era; I simply added one of my own. Why is that a problem? Stop spoiling a good thread.
It was an observation of that era from the perspective of a teenager. You came out with some irrelevant ****e about 9 and 10 year olds to spoll a good thread. Now **** off.
Aye, a bit bizarre. Not sure how I picked an argument, or did anything other than make a simple observation.
No anger from me Kempton, as I predicted a 1-3 loss; just bemusement at what the daft sod was on about. Chazz is just Chazz, no change there, except for his tampon.
That’s really interesting I have to say I was vaguely aware of a couple of them, but less so regarding the ‘qualifications’ needed for them Cheers for that
Doesn't it annoy you when people ask you what you will be doing in three years time. They must think I have 20 20 vision.
Restrict your children to just a few minutes internet time each day by enabling Microsoft Windows updates.
