Off Topic And Now for Something Completely Different

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Fez said:
You did notice I deliberately targeted nine and ten year olds in my post. Maybe you equate your 14 year old self with them, but that would be your call...
Click to expand...

So, speaking as someone who was 13 at the time and with reference to the Beatles, whose fans weren't 10 and 11 at that time what has 10 and 11 year olds got to do with it? Other than you are a silly ****?
 
Barchullona said:
So, speaking as someone who was 13 at the time and with reference to the Beatles, whose fans weren't 10 and 11 at that time what has 10 and 11 year olds got to do with it? Other than you are a silly ****?
Click to expand...

I didn't mention the Beatles or eleven year olds. It was just a general comment referring to the era you used. I was 9 or 10 in 1963 and I liked The Beatles, so did my mates. Why the abuse? For a clever man you really are ducking stupid.
 
Fez said:
You did notice I deliberately targeted nine and ten year olds in my post. Maybe you equate your 14 year old self with them, but that would be your call...
Click to expand...

So, what has 9 and 10 year olds to do with a post about teenagers? Except in your alternative universe.
 
Fez said:
I didn't mention the Beatles or eleven year olds. It was just a general comment referring to the era you used. I was 9 or 10 in 1963 and I liked The Beatles, so did my mates. Why the abuse? For a clever man you really are ducking stupid.
Click to expand...

For a stupid **** you really are ****ing stupid,
 
Barchullona said:
So, what has 9 and 10 year olds to do with a post about teenagers? Except in your alternative universe.
Click to expand...

Having reread your post it still comes across as a post about 1963 and your observations of that era; I simply added one of my own. Why is that a problem? Stop spoiling a good thread.
 
Fez said:
Having reread your post it still comes across as a post about 1963 and your observations of that era; I simply added one of my own. Why is that a problem? Stop spoiling a good thread.
Click to expand...

It was an observation of that era from the perspective of a teenager. You came out with some irrelevant ****e about 9 and 10 year olds to spoll a good thread. Now **** off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chazz Rheinhold
Barchullona said:
It was an observation of that era from the perspective of a teenager. You came out with some irrelevant ****e about 9 and 10 year olds to spoll a good thread. Now **** off.
Click to expand...

Chazz likes your post; a sadder indictment you don' get. Off for a bevy.
 
Kempton said:
It's funny how the anger comes out when we lose.
Click to expand...

No anger from me Kempton, as I predicted a 1-3 loss; just bemusement at what the daft sod was on about. Chazz is just Chazz, no change there, except for his tampon.
 
Doesn't it annoy you when people ask you what you will be doing in three years time.

They must think I have 20 20 vision.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back