Africans

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There's an old adage in boxing which says when a black man fights a white man always bet on the black man.

Yet look around boxing now and see how many champions are white, especially in the heavyweight division which for decades was dominated by black athletes.

It's swings and roundabouts.
 
Interesting. I still think it's bollocks. Black people just tend to be more naturally muscular. Which makes them better at 'explosive' sports like sprinting and boxing.

So why no African athletes winning the sprinting?

Why only people of West African origin who live in ex-colonnial countries?

No African has been heavyweight champion of the world that I can remember - only American, British and British-Canadian ones I can remember.

The Chinese quite often win the ping pong and the badminton at the olympics - it's unfair to suggest that a Sri Lankan would be more likely to win either of these things simply because they come from the same continent.
 
There's an old adage in boxing which says when a black man fights a white man always bet on the black man.

Always bet on the hungry man. Hence the current dominance of the Heavyweight division by citizens of the former Soviet Union. And hence the number of Mexicans dominating the lighter weights. Of course, access to the best trainers is also required, which explains the lack of African world champions.
 
Interesting. I still think it's bollocks. Black people just tend to be more naturally muscular. Which makes them better at 'explosive' sports like sprinting and boxing.

So why no African athletes winning the sprinting?

Why only people of West African origin who live in ex-colonnial countries?

No African has been heavyweight champion of the world that I can remember - only American, British and British-Canadian ones I can remember.

The Chinese quite often win the ping pong and the badminton at the olympics - it's unfair to suggest that a Sri Lankan would be more likely to win either of these things simply because they come from the same continent.

Facilities? The Afro-Caribbeans and Afro- Americans have the same physiology but much better training, equipment, opportunities etc.
 
Facilities? The Afro-Caribbeans and Afro- Americans have the same physiology but much better training, equipment, opportunities etc.

Facilities play their part but so does centuries of social engineering. The Kenyans from the valley in the BBC piece don't have brilliant facilities.

Probably worth mentioning is people from mixed race backgrounds - having as varied a genetic background as possible is seen as genetically advantageous (according to Stephen Jay Gould, anyway) - people of mixed race are probably over-represented in sport and this could have a genetic reason.

Just saying "black people are faster and stronger" isn't the whole picture.
 
At the risk of being labelled 'anti-western' <laugh>

Hitler and his idea of the 'superior race' was not a new concept

The British and americans beat him to it years before.

The idea of a 'perfect slave' had them experimenting with all sorts. Including incest

slaves were 'bred' to be stronger, faster etc

Bit like Steve Austin the 6 million dollar man, but without the technology or the finance
 
At the risk of being labelled 'anti-western' <laugh>

Hitler and his idea of the 'superior race' was not a new concept

The British and americans beat him to it years before.

The idea of a 'perfect slave' had them experimenting with all sorts. Including incest

slaves were 'bred' to be stronger, faster etc


Bit like Steve Austin the 6 million dollar man, but without the technology or the finance

Evidence, please. Or shall I file this under "utter bollocks, made up for effect"?