One of the more bizarre transfer clauses i have seen!
http://www.caughtoffside.com/2012/0...-charity-before-agreeing-to-tottenham-switch/
That's not so bizarre as having unlimited wealth and using it to buy a football team in a foreign country to get some reflected glory that will not be seen as glory at all, just unlimited wealth badly used.
Anyone who believes anything from that website has obviously been bit by the mad monkey.

Can you see City agreeing to it? I can't!
If a charity donation is the problem it could be done easily by a one off donation by Man City's owners outside of football. It wouldn't take two minutes and certainly wouldn't hold up a transfer. I can only conclude the article is a load of tosh.
Then City wouldn't get the tax break on the donation, the money has to come from club coffers. A weekly donation is better for cash flow.
Quite possibly, as far as a business is concerned, charity donations are tax exempt, wages of course are not.
I think it is the other way around. Paying wages reduces your tax bill via increasing your costs (so reducing profit). I think charitable donations only count as costs if they are made for business purposes
I think it is the other way around. Paying wages reduces your tax bill via increasing your costs (so reducing profit). I think charitable donations only count as costs if they are made for business purposes

As said above, they are already running at a such a loss that extra cost doesn't help them with Tax payments.

I really do hope that Levy has a plan B and a plan C, because we need at least two strikers. Plan A seems to have failed.
I can see us going into the new season with only one established striker.
It's not looking good.
How much money do you think Levy has to spend? Looks like Spurs and Liverpool fan's hope of spending some money this summer isn't quite going the way we wanted it to go.