Michael Kightly is still a good player, but the rest of the Southend players you wouldn’t give two bob for. Southend at home when they are down to ten men is the sort of game you must win to have any hope of promotion - yet we never looked remotely like winning that game today. Over the last 6/7 transfer windows we have collected a lot of players with similar traits - small, lightweight, talented on their day, injury prone. Vetekole’s performance as a centre forward today was horrible, and when you augment a lame duck striker with two gadfly wingers with hearts the size of frozen peas ....no wonder we can’t score.
I agree almost completely with this.
Perhaps it's a bit harsh to say we 'never remotely looked like winning' as their keeper did pull off two terrific saves during that period after we equalised, when it seemed for a while like we had enough momentum to force in a second goal.
But as a general comment on the whole game I do broadly agree with the sentiment.
Charlton huffed and puffed (as they say) and pressed many attacking moves, but never seemed to have a player in the right place at the right time who was able to provide the finish. Vetokele has been on social media recently so I understand, raising hopes among the gullible by saying he will try to return to his best.
Yeah, OK Igor. Just let us know when you're going to begin trying a bit harder.
And the assessment of our other players as 'lightweight' is spot on.
I won't deny Southend were playing anti-football for a lot of the time after they lost a player - that's only to be expected. But if we cannot effectively counter that obvious tactic in a team as absolutely average as SUFC then Charlton don't deserve to go back to the Championship.
And there were too many scary moments towards the end of that match where Southend counter-attacks (many stemming from possession needlessly given away in midfield) could have produced a 1-2 away win.



