It will most probably be a Tuesday night in November!
Whats fireworks?
It will most probably be a Tuesday night in November!
So there bloody should be, but our ****ing board members should of made sure this discussion wasn't even happening.

In what way, is your self loathing so bad you feel you deserve another hammering?
Bet thats what you thought about the col who game!
Your not by any chance replacing ruddy with an aussie?
No, I expected the worse against Colchester because I knew we'd purchased rubbish, had a rubbish manager and had a terrible goalkeeper.
carrabuh, maybe you should switch to: http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/norwichunitedfc/ for a season or two.
No, I expected the worse against Colchester because I knew we'd purchased rubbish, had a rubbish manager and had a terrible goalkeeper.
Like others, I don't understand this decision, but the Board bears full responsibility for making it. If it works and City win promotion, then they will be vindicated, but if we don't the fault will lie fairly and squarely with the Board. What I won't do is cherry pick individuals to blame if it goes wrong. The whole Board has made the decision 'unanimously' and therefore the responsibility is shared throughout whether it goes right or wrong.
The first test is how many players stay. If Adams can persuade enough of them to stay then there may be some hope. They know him and his methods and might buy into it. If they don't, however, it will be a case of rebuilding from scratch with the new squad trying to gel under an inexperienced manager. I sincerely hope it works out and we push for promotion. Right now, I'm having difficulty seeing that happen and I think we are entitled to more of an explanation than we have received so far.

And.
We don't have a terrible goalkeeper and we don't have terrible players
You however have both.
We don't have a terrible goalkeeper and we don't have terrible players
You however have both.

Its not really about knowing what will happen. It could of course all work out fine but to me it would be more luck than judgement.
Its about understanding any reasons to appoint him, frankly there are none.
Everything points to a position of failure, there is just no evidence to support the appointment but plenty to suggest otherwise.
Just asking for troublethat they could have easily stayed away from.
What I won't do is cherry pick individuals to blame if it goes wrong. The whole Board has made the decision 'unanimously' and therefore the responsibility is shared throughout whether it goes right or wrong.