Nope, should still be in 2nd, alphabetical order
United has +2 so they're top, Liverpool +1 with us but scored 4, so they're second.
Transfer Rumours 2016/17 City Transfer Thread
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
United has +2 so they're top, Liverpool +1 with us but scored 4, so they're second.
Pretty sure at this stage it goes off Alphabet, it did on Saturday anyway
EDIT........after goal difference.
Pretty sure at this stage it goes off Alphabet, it did on Saturday anyway
EDIT........after goal difference.
On Saturday Man City and us had both scored 2, fairly sure goals scored is before Alphabetical.
Then how were you top, H comes before M
EDIT.............you could well be right though, they don't normally post tables this early
Then how were you top, H comes before M
Because we'd scored the same amount as Man City.
GD
Goals For
Alphabetical
I think that's the differentiating factors.
Yeah, just edited my post mate
Doesn't matter, we'll be first in our own right next week when we beat Swansea.
Doesn't matter, we'll be first in our own right next week when we beat Swansea.
That's a true supporter speaking
Would be a nice top of the table clash when you come to the KCOM in the third week.
We can have a proper argument thenWould be a nice top of the table clash when you come to the KCOM in the third week.
We can have a proper argument then
I've never had an argument in my life, but I can give it a crack.
Me neither, but I do wum a bit. Sometimes I win sometimes I lose (it's all subjective), I never get personal or nasty, that's not funI've never had an argument in my life, but I can give it a crack.
Me neither, but I do wum a bit. Sometimes I win sometimes I lose (it's all subjective), I never get personal or nasty, that's not fun
I'll get a bit sweary if someone gets sweary with me, but other than that sounds about right.
Anywho best not derail from the riveting news of our latest signing!
You were the one who started the whole thing by making out I didn't know what FFP was and you thought it was an issue when it clearly wasn't. If you hadn't started the stupid issue it wouldn't have got going. Making out that Hull City, who hadn't signed anybody and had been reducing wages for the last couple of years, could have an FFP problem was clearly ludicrous.
Best of luck with the rest of the season and hope you get some players in before SeptI'll get a bit sweary if someone gets sweary with me, but other than that sounds about right.
Anywho best not derail from the riveting news of our latest signing!
One day top, next day third, where will it end? don't say - I have a good idea!
Christ sakes. I made a comment that we couldn't throw bags of cash at top of the line players as someone had suggested we could with new owners. That was my only comment. You then made two replies, one of which took a pot-shot at me for absolutely no reason. I then dropped it and you made a further 3 replies to the issue which I had given up on. As if you didn't need the last word only once, but three times. Then somehow it was my fault for starting it and my fault for not walking away even though I did. I didn't realise the cap only applied to clubs with wage bills over 60m for the previous season, I thought it was a blanket rule applied at any time. I was wrong. I walked away. What more do you want?
Who you think shouldn't be allowed because of FFP.I'll get a bit sweary if someone gets sweary with me, but other than that sounds about right.
Anywho best not derail from the riveting news of our latest signing!
Not even close to what I said, but carry on. You seem in the mood for an argument but I can't be arsed.
What was the bit where you said that TV money wasn't part of the calculation?
You didn't say you were wrong. As far as anybody knew you still thought you were right. Now you are complaining that people explain where you were wrong.
I'd rather you didn't make any ridiculous posts in the first place and then when people query your posts you make out that they don't know something that you know know when in fact it's you that has the lack of knowledge.