2013 Confederations Cup

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mikey said:
They shouldn't have been there and it devalues the tournament, but they earned my respect with their approach and attitude.
Click to expand...

Yes. It would be interesting to know whether their tactics were solely due to naivety, tactically ineptness or they are genuinely deluded. Perhaps a combination of the three. Playing such a high line was plain stupid and suicidal lol. They should have played and real deep 4-1-4-1. 5-4-1 with a high line is just garbage.
 
New Era said:
Yes. It would be interesting to know whether their tactics were solely due to naivety, tactically ineptness or they are genuinely deluded. Perhaps a combination of the three. Playing such a high line was plain stupid and suicidal lol. They should have played and real deep 4-1-4-1. 5-4-1 with a high line is just garbage.
Click to expand...

Indeed, going forwards they impressed me but their defensive set-up and ability were pretty laughable.
 
I think they just realised that even if they played a 10-0-0 formation they were likely to get beaten 3-0, so they decided they might as well have some fun and get beat 6-1, but at least score a goal.
 
Sounds like it's going to go ahead anyway, this is all embarrassing for Brazil with the World Cup and Olympics coming up though.
 
penalty

saved!!!!! good refereeing to give it btw. most referees would have bottled it
 
Forlan is playing horrendously. He needs to give the set pieces to Suarez
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back