10k? What a load of crap?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
HDM said that ipswich are paying 40% of Jimmys wages which is around the £20K mark
 
blackandamber said:
http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/sport/HULL-CITY-Bullard-Ipswich-confirmed/article-3153153-detail/article.html

hull daily mail now reporting it being over 20000 aswell, paha, theyre useless at reporting.

20k is a brilliant saving, 40k saved within a couple of weeks is brilliant business. anyone care to workout the wage bill? presume mcshane is now our top earner.
Click to expand...

Frightening to think that our best paid player is probably the least talented player in the squad.

It's good to see Adam commenting on all these things.
 
Spanner82 said:
HDM said that ipswich are paying 40% of Jimmys wages which is around the £20K mark
Click to expand...

Originally their breaking news was Ipswich were only paying 10k. It's been changed now lol. Journalism at its best!
 
The way it's written "loan contribution" sounds like we got a loan fee for him.

Ipswich suggest they're paying £10k pw and the HDM suggested it was £18k pw.

Between now and the end of the season (assuming end of May) is around 4 months or 17 weeks.

£8k pw for 17 weeks is £136k so perhaps we got a loan fee of £100k?

If he gets injured does he come back?

Can Ipswich claim they're paying £10k a week and we can take £100k and receive a crocked Bullard back next week?
 
originallambrettaman said:
It looks like the pennies dropped in tractorland

http://www.twtd.co.uk/news.php?storyid=17795
Click to expand...

sounds like the penny has dropped indeed the fans dont sound happy about this signing at all to quote one:

"itfc711 added 14:27 - Jan 27

Is there something we don't know hear as they seem far more happy with two united youngsters and another new player than someone not good enough to get in their first team?

Clever buying by them. "
 
"Walk_the_Wark added 14:51 - Jan 27

Bullard will barely play due to fitness, and is by all accounts an a***hole and difficult to manage. Very expensive red herring- mark my words. Austin on the other hand- if we pull this off, transfer coup of the last 5 years...if not 10! "
 
If the reports are true about bullard 3 operations just how much has the club spent on his knees. flights accommodation top knee specialist in the usa times that by 3.
 
hu7tiger said:
If the reports are true about bullard 3 operations just how much has the club spent on his knees. flights accommodation top knee specialist in the usa times that by 3.
Click to expand...


Is that sort of thing not covered by insurance? Surely the players are insured against that sort of thing, especially ones as injury prone as JB?
 
originallambrettaman said:
We couldn't get any insurance on Bullard, due to his previous injury and the fact that he was carrying an injury when we signed him.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't actually like to think of the figure then, it must be astronomical when you consider how much decent game time he's actually had for us, not to mention his wages and the fee!
 
He may come back a better player. Stronger,fitter,keener and leaner.

If my team were in a relegation battle I would consider 20k a week for 20 weeks = 400k worst scenario, a chance worth taking, for a player of Bullards ability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back