New owner confirmed…

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mr Hatem said:
If you say so.
Click to expand...



Shame. I thought you’d have replied in Latin, or some other language you could quickly Google translate.

Post 1606: you claim that your response was ‘to help you understand how to use et al in the future and to help others too’.

Post: 1615: you claim that your response was due to ‘Trout was behaving like a twat, that’s why I corrected him’

Janus faced? Or do you just struggle keeping track of the ****e you post on here?
 
pierredelafranchesca said:
to be fair lads, we've not seen much attacking these past 3 years so it's an easy mistake to make to assume somethings an attack when you see it
Click to expand...

All the posts of late are just a hopeful punt - not sure any of it is attacking. Too many think skinned people in this forum though. Perhaps 'think for a minute' before hitting reply. You'll probably find you think 'meh...whatever' instead of filling the forum with touchy junk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT, mcr_tiger, Stockholm Tiger and 1 other person
I give up. You just can't post anything on here without it been misquoted or twisted.

I never corrected anyone's grammar on this board today. I don't care if your written English is appalling or perfect. I corrected Trout's wrong use of a Latin term, as I thought he was putting down a new poster and trying to sound superior by using Latin.
 
I don't mind spelling mistakes but I can't forgive been instead of being!
willyfog said:
All the posts of late are just a hopeful punt - not sure any of it is attacking. Too many think skinned people in this forum though. Perhaps 'think for a minute' before hitting reply. You'll probably find you think 'meh...whatever' instead of filling the forum with touchy junk.
Click to expand...
You're getting an -E for that! Must try harder! <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber and willyfog
Andy Moj said:
Guys, I don't post on here very often however as an ex Director Hull Forward/Hull City build (the old regeneration company for Hull) I think I need to clarify a few points that you are discussing, Re investors and investment into the site.

It is not as simple as re-developing the ground and surrounding area, the land on on Walton Street is somewhat land locked and restricted in terms of its ability to bring forward large scale regeneration/development projects, due to major traffic flow concerns. Also, the local plan currently does not recognise developments of this nature outside of the city centre boundary therefore, it would be difficult to obtain planning due to a number of factors - for any investor.

Originally the KC Stadium was designed with a Rail station this would have elevated traffic flow problems, however, due to the disruption it would have caused to Network Rail and the delay it would have had on the build on the KC Stadium it was not pursued.

Adam Pearson was the first to discuss Casino's, Hotel's. Leisure facilities etc, and he was equally frustrated by the answer. Then the Allam' s come along with more or less the same offer but also requested a Public sector asset transfer (KC Stadium value 60-70m) they didn't want to purchase it, but said they wanted to develop a site that currently can't be developed???

Major long term Infrastructure improvements would have to be made before any perceived developments can move forward, and who pays for that, the Council and they have no money? This would also need to be supported in the local Planning framework which it currently isn't.

So if our American friends think they've seen some a development others haven't they are going to be disappointed, lets hope their interests are in buying a great club with passionate fans?

Certainly isn't straight forward unless the Council do a you u-turn, find some money and Planning amend its local framework?!

Cheers

AndyM
Click to expand...
So there is absolutely no chance of any building development on there Andy?
So the Allams or a new owner could possibly buy the stadium for say 30 million. they would then have to fund a new stand also for our massive untapped potential. but still not be able to build anything around there to help fund the development?
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
So there is absolutely no chance of any building development on there Andy?
So the Allams or a new owner could possibly buy the stadium for say 30 million. they would then have to fund a new stand also for our massive untapped potential. but still not be able to build anything around there to help fund the development?
Click to expand...

My reading of Andy's post is it depends on Hull City Council.

Can they find any money for a sports village, yes they can through the new leisure company. Would they be willing to amend the local framework? I think they would.

If the Americans promise to develop the area in partnership with the Council, Brady will roll on his back with his legs in the air waiting to be tickled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renegadetiger
Chazz Rheinhold said:
So there is absolutely no chance of any building development on there Andy?
So the Allams or a new owner could possibly buy the stadium for say 30 million. they would then have to fund a new stand also for our massive untapped potential. but still not be able to build anything around there to help fund the development?
Click to expand...

That's absolutely not the case.
 
originallambrettaman said:
That's absolutely not the case.
Click to expand...
So how do you answer Andy's point
Major long term Infrastructure improvements would have to be made before any perceived developments can move forward, and who pays for that, the Council and they have no money? This would also need to be supported in the local Planning framework which it currently isn't.

So if our American friends think they've seen some a development others haven't they are going to be disappointed, lets hope their interests are in buying a great club with passionate fans?

Certainly isn't straight forward unless the Council do a you u-turn, find some money and Planning amend its local framework?!

I've always wondered where any of these supposed developments would fit in on the site
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
So how do you answer Andy's point
Major long term Infrastructure improvements would have to be made before any perceived developments can move forward, and who pays for that, the Council and they have no money? This would also need to be supported in the local Planning framework which it currently isn't.

So if our American friends think they've seen some a development others haven't they are going to be disappointed, lets hope their interests are in buying a great club with passionate fans?

Certainly isn't straight forward unless the Council do a you u-turn, find some money and Planning amend its local framework?!

I've always wondered where any of these supposed developments would fit in on the site
Click to expand...

It's wrong.

All will be revealed shortly.
 
All it needs is two willing partners and anything is possible. Of course you can't build loads of things around the stadium without improving the surrounding infrastructure the two go hand in hand.

I know its East Yorks council but didn't they do a deal with a property developer for the land north from Swinemoor Lane which included the developer building the northern by-pass in return for permission to build houses up there?
 
Why are folk still looking for meaning in posts on here, instead of waiting for the real news?

Bewildering.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back