If he sells and the name stays the same that is also fine with although I'd be sad we'd lost a great owner thanks to a small noisy minority who fear any change.
I reckon your smoking the same **** as him!
If he sells and the name stays the same that is also fine with although I'd be sad we'd lost a great owner thanks to a small noisy minority who fear any change.
He isn't a football fan so why would he step back in the stadium if he sold up? No need to be so precious about that statement.
Sorry to disappoint but the name simply is not important to me. It can change or it can stay the same, I don't care. What I care about is my club in my city. The name would not affect how I feel about the club I've been going to since the 60s and the team I've supported since then. The name is irrelevant to me.
If he stays and if he wants to change the name that s fine with me.
If he sells and the name stays the same that is also fine with although I'd be sad we'd lost a great owner thanks to a small noisy minority who fear any change.
You don't care? Well you should do, it's not too late.He isn't a football fan so why would he step back in the stadium if he sold up? No need to be so precious about that statement.
Sorry to disappoint but the name simply is not important to me. It can change or it can stay the same, I don't care. What I care about is my club in my city. The name would not affect how I feel about the club I've been going to since the 60s and the team I've supported since then. The name is irrelevant to me.
If he stays and if he wants to change the name that s fine with me.
If he sells and the name stays the same that is also fine with although I'd be sad we'd lost a great owner thanks to a small noisy minority who fear any change.
YesAre you still willing to allow this man to change our name when he says as soon as he sells the club he will not set foot in the stadium again?
And bear in mind he is now suggesting the Labour party change their name . . . .
So answers please, all you "yes men". Are you still happy to let him change our name?
Nah. You're the same as the other Luddites. You asked a question hoping for a response so you could argue about it and try to force your own views on others.I would sincerely love to hear your reasoning and again could you answer my second rephrased question to Happy Tiger?
Well you're obviously the expert on musicals.You could have been in the Wizard Of Oz, either the lion, or the scarecrow, or just a friend of Dorothy's.
More bullshit just to get his name in the news.
Now he claims he's turned down 3 offers, well I can't believe that not one of them wouldn't come out and say we want to buy Hull City but the owner won't sell it to us.
Same as his Hull Tiger sponsor, a figment of his imagination.
Are you still willing to allow this man to change our name when he says as soon as he sells the club he will not set foot in the stadium again?
And bear in mind he is now suggesting the Labour party change their name . . . .
So answers please, all you "yes men". Are you still happy to let him change our name?
Yes[/QU
Save yourself while you can, they're poisoning the wells again..blimey, this thread is like an outing for the local nuthouse.
thought about what's really important in life, a slight change to the name of a football club isn't.
I'd re-name it "The Party Party"
so we can all party
I don't know if this has been said before, after all this petty name change garbage seems to have been going in forever now, but it really wouldn't surprise me if AA only considered a 'good home' for the club to be a buyer who will agree to a legally binding clause in the contract which states that the new owner HAS to forge ahead with the name change. It would certainly give a new owner the worst possible start, however I'm pretty certain that it would be highly entertaining and amusing for the Allam family.