Someone mentioned this a few weeks ago, I can’t remember who but I repeated it in the last day or so and one or two people suggested that it would only be a part of the alleged £6m.
Transfer Rumours Summer 2026 Transfer Thread…
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Here's a novel idea, see what July 1st brings, by then we may well have shifted enough out to cover any shortfall.
Abridged version, don't do what if, do what is.
It's our time.
Abridged version, don't do what if, do what is.
It's our time.
Can't be having common sense statements like that on hereHere's a novel idea, see what July 1st brings, by then we may well have shifted enough out to cover any shortfall.
Abridged version, don't do what if, do what is.
It's our time.
You are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EpictetusHere's a novel idea, see what July 1st brings, by then we may well have shifted enough out to cover any shortfall.
Abridged version, don't do what if, do what is.
It's our time.
And I claim my 5 Silver Drachma...
Well take it then.Sorry, my medication is due.
It's our time.
Promotion bonusses are not the cause of a breach apparently...
You must log in or register to see media
That’s odd as the BBC article said they were and even said that’s how Forest got stung as well.
The BBC have updated the article...
Initially it was believed the club's overspend had been caused by promotion bonuses which were triggered by the 1-0 victory over Boro in the Championship showdown at Wembley.
But it has since come to light that these payments are, in effect, ghosted in the accounts for the calculation in the season which the promotion happens.
Hull would have faced PSR challenges regardless of winning the play-off final.
Just read the BBC article and it must have been editted recently, states it was initially thought the play off bonuses took us over but that isn't the case.
Not that one who stole cars..what was his name???? Ermmm.........
Tomi tukamota...
Makes sense. I can remember Acun saying we needed to sell regardless of promotion in the Q&A before the Norwich game.
Those -6 points could be the difference between Champions league and the conference for us.
Here's another novel idea, on the basis that any club exceeds its PSR limit due entirely 100% to payment of promotion bonuses, which clearly demonstrates a club is well run, then why can't common sense prevail and allow that to be an exception to the rule? Being penalised for success seems completely inappropriate and counter productive.
I heard Terry D gets 5% too
Seems from what the BBC are reporting it isn't just down to the promotion bonus paid to players, they've changed their stance
Perhaps anyone at BBC with half a grain of sense is on the World Cup gravy train..just leaving the minions to draft incorrect articles.
Depends, if he's like that Rayan at Bournemouth he might jump straight in. He doesn't have to be registered at that age, but he does lack experience so it'd be good to get him in early and see how he does in pre season.
Going by the image, an uncanny likeness, those that know me will agree.
It's our time.
What?! Six points is two wins. Most teams aim to win 10 games and then pick up draws away from home. We'd just need to win 12 out of 38 instead of 10, that's all. It's not even half. Granted that's easier said than done, but the negative six looks worse than it is in reality. It doesn't make our job of staying up any easier, but it doesn't make it impossible either.
Anyway, it's unlikely it'll happen.