A few on RTG need to realise that Sunderland invariably ask for the maximum allocation because of the supporters who forward tickets, go with branches and other groups ...
... not despite them.
In every 3000 allocation, the majority will be taken by SC holders, who want to go, leaving a small percentage of people in branches, etc, who get tickets without always having enough points.
The ideal, for some people, would apparently be that the club asks for 2000 and every single one goes to valid SC holders with adequate points. FFS, quite often it's only because of exiles, branches, etc, who can arrange travel, travel, accommodation, etc, that we manage to fill the maximum allocations.
Even then out of every 3000 allocation there's probably only dozens that go to the stragglers ...
... without those people we'd start to see gaps in away sections.
This isn't ticket grooming on a vast scale, very few ever miss out on tickets in reality. If a 65yo, with points, finds they can't manage the longer away trips is it really so dreadful their nephew goes on their hard earned points? Let's get real, if an 18yo buys their first SC now if will be a decade or more before they have enough points for the majority of games. By which time they're probably out of the loop and unlikely to suddenly start going just when they have a decent job, mortgage, kids, etc.
It's obvious, if you travel away regularly, that selling 3000 tickets to 3000 individuals wouldn't regularly sell out. It's only because branches, pubs, groups, etc, have banded together for cost reasons that we invariably sell out maximum allocations. Seriously, if 3000 tickets went on sale for Brighton to individuals people would struggle to make independent arrangements especially if they go into the lower phases ...
... once the TV companies get involved it's incredible how we manage to sell out in my opinion.