I don't really get it, Claude Puel had vast amounts of experience in France before he came here and a fair amount of real success with big clubs too yet he was greeted with lots of scepticism when appointed.
Will Still is only 32 and hasn't really achieved anything yet and has only 125 games as a manager yet some fans are willing to overlook these facts.
Is it his unusual back story or his age that is the difference? Is he a hipster choice? I think he's a big gamble like Pellegrino was and as Magic says I would prefer a more experienced pair of hands at this time.
Will Still is only 32 and hasn't really achieved anything yet and has only 125 games as a manager yet some fans are willing to overlook these facts.
Is it his unusual back story or his age that is the difference? Is he a hipster choice? I think he's a big gamble like Pellegrino was and as Magic says I would prefer a more experienced pair of hands at this time.
