Flagging…

Amin Yapusi said:

Just a city fan or a cis city fan?

Click to expand...

I don’t judge man.

Before it's locked, just for the record I have nine children, one of each.


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.

charon-the-ferryman said:

as so often in these cases, people who are offended by anything and everything don't seem to mind offending others whilst also deciding whether someone has the right to be offended by what they say - as gammon refers to elderly white men then it's both racist and ageist - cis is also deemed offensive - so whilst you're preaching about what offends you please be aware that you are also offending people with the language you use - unfortunately this is how todays intolerant virtue signalling society works - it's not all one way as some would like it to be

Click to expand...

It does not refer to elderly white men. It refers to anybody who uses jingoistic nationalism to make a point and gets angry when said things aren’t immediately sorted. I can list you plenty of non-white people who are gammon.
C** is a term used to describe people who were born with a gender that matches their biological sex. It’s never been used as an insult, so why would it be offensive? The fact that it’s “deemed offensive” is just because people are trying to marginalise the trans community.

I grew up watching watching things like South Park, Jackass and Brass Eye, you’ll be hard pushed to find something that seriously offends me personally.

Steven Toast said:

Alphabet people? Are you testing me Satan?

And if I was going for the super gaslighty facts vs feelings approach, I’d probably want to make sure my facts were definitely in order. The prefix cis- was used in academic circles long before it fell into the mainstream and much like the word gammon (which bizarrely is now viewed as racist by the receiving end), the meaning only changed when people who were called it became annoyed, despite it in no way being an insult.

Click to expand...

The clear and obvious fact that you chose to use terms that you know are objectionable to many, and then try to justify them with pseudo science says so much about you, especially given the topic at hand.