Quite simply, VAR is ruining the game for me.It's as though they are trying to justify their existence and " fix" a problem that didn't really exist. Can anyone say that what we have now is better than before?
Quite simply, VAR is ruining the game for me.It's as though they are trying to justify their existence and " fix" a problem that didn't really exist. Can anyone say that what we have now is better than before?
We'd probably need data gathered over a longer period to accurately analyse that, tbh.It's very easy to feel hard done by when a decision goes against you. When that decision was erroneous, it's even harder.
You would think that over the course of the season it's swings and roundabouts but looking at the VAR table from last season shows that some teams are benefiting far more and some are being penalised far more. Oddly enough, Brighton were top last season by +8 and are currently top with +3. Other than man utd last season on +7, all the other teams at the top of the VAR table - which amounts to a favourable decision table - were the 'lesser ' teams. The same is true so far this season. (We are currently on -7, well adrift.). That looks like good old British favouring the underdog behaviour.
We do, but the injury part is no coincidence - Klopp's unusual outspokenness about it speaks volumes.
One thing that ****ed me off was the Mane goal from a dead ball... Where is the ****ing flag so no one gets their hopes up!! Piss poor to miss that.
It's the policy of letting the move end I suppose. It's something I've disapproved of since its inception.
Imagine a player marginally offside put through on goal, keeper rushes out or defender throws himself into a last-ditch tackle - someone could get seriously injured in a move that should have been stopped.
It's another attempt to show how VAR can improve things, when it can just make it worse.
The rules of football evolved fairly slowly. There's been more tinkering with them over the last few years than in a century beforehand. Neither the players, fans nor the officials can keep up with it.
Well that all happened very quickly and there was no way Pickford was going to know that the game had stopped (that doesn't absolve him of course, the challenge was reckless under any circumstances) - I'm thinking more of occasions where there's a few seconds between the offside incident and the resolution of the move.Surely that would never happen.... vvd
I agree but you can only work with what you've got and currently, although as you say not much data, there is a pattern emerging. I don't think there's a conspiracy against us specifically but looking at what's happening there is a clear advantage being given to the underdog. The only anomaly is man utd, who'd have thoughtWe'd probably need data gathered over a longer period to accurately analyse that, tbh.
Favouritism isn't really the issue for me, it's just that any marginal advantages the system may offer are far outweighed by the disadvantages.

Surely that would never happen.... vvd
VAR is not perfect but other countries seem to be using a whole lot better than the PL is. If there is one 'positive' out of VAR, is that it really does highlight how incompetent the refs are. Before VAR, you could defend refs and say that they're only humans for making mistakes.
Banning the use of lines will lead to court cases of discrimination against visually impaired VARs who suffer from astigmatism and therefore not be sure of their straight lines...Getting rid of the drawn on lines for an offside decision would immediately improve that part of VAR. If the distance is too close to be seen without drawing lines and getting it mm perfect then it should just favour the attacker. Did anybody ever imagine they'd be talking about the length of a player's sleeve being the deciding factor in whether his goal stood or not?
Or, could just leave it to the linesman.Getting rid of the drawn on lines for an offside decision would immediately improve that part of VAR. If the distance is too close to be seen without drawing lines and getting it mm perfect then it should just favour the attacker. Did anybody ever imagine they'd be talking about the length of a player's sleeve being the deciding factor in whether his goal stood or not?
Are there any updates on him? He legged it down the tunnel, I thought he may have had a bathroom emergency.In all the talk about the game, did anyone mention the fact that Lallana managed to get in 8 minutes?
I do genuinely feel sorry for him.
Banning the use of lines will lead to court cases of discrimination against visually impaired VARs who suffer from astigmatism and therefore not be sure of their straight lines...![]()
Are there any updates on him? He legged it down the tunnel, I thought he may have had a bathroom emergency.

That was my first thought as well, but he'd only been on 5 minutes - must have hyperactive bowels.I said as much at the time![]()
That was my first thought as well, but he'd only been on 5 minutes - must have hyperactive bowels.
"Oh Adam, you should have gone before you came out!"
