You missed my point. You can't just look at video and say, yes, that's hundred percent authentic. Surely I'm merely doing what you do with inofrmation you are contrary to, not taking it at face value.
My example was, to me, it appeared it was hot off the press, but then I find it's 5 days old, then find it's 10 days old, now you know as well has what I do, within the space of 10 days, that opinion could have changed for a variety of reasons, he was clearly venting off some steam.
But somehow you want me to listen to it, and once I've done that, accept it as genuine, sorry bruv but it don't work like that for me. How many times have I challenged newspaper articles, regarding photos and stories and proved them different from another angle.
It seems you don't abide by your own rules, regarding facts, you are just like the sheep you complain about, you follow whatever suits your narrative
I will probably listen to it again sometime, but probably not for the reasons you would like![]()
you can do what you like fella, no skin off my nose but you are obviously trying a dig at why im gullible and you are not
.....my only game is to put it out there>>>>>>its up 2 others what they make of it...........<wink>
by the way i also think this is a sham............
