Water on Mars

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Religion has no standard model unlike science which does to which parts of its understanding are fact based. The pseudo scientists just expand their own unproven thoughts to fill in the gaps which in reality is liken to putting a band-aid on a leper.

This <ok>

Science might not be 100% accurate, but at least it attempts to be and actively tries disprove it's own theories in order to give them rigour. In that way it can be considered the closest explanation to what we can call fact.

I think Religion and Faith have a place, but more for a moral code (although some of it is highly questionable) and guide for living your life, but I do not think Religion does a good job at trying to explain how the universe came into existence.

In some ways the pseudo scientists and crackpots are worse than Religious leaders, because they try to present their ideas as fact, when they are based in little more than faith.
 
Never heard such a stupid question like 'who created God'

He wouldn't be God if he was created <doh>

It's a typical stupid question Godless people ask

'Can God make a rock more powerful than him that it can destroy him?'

You answer no then how can he be God? You answer 'yes' then it shows he's can't be God as there is something more powerful than him.

There's been plenty warnings against this kind of Heathen thinking...it's best Atheists don't waste everyone's time by trying to justify their own beliefs....because you're all going to be a long time waiting if you think God is going to sell himself to you so you can have faith.

Carry on worshiping your football clubs lads...it's a good level for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mantis
Never heard such a stupid question like 'who created God'

He wouldn't be God if he was created <doh>

It's a typical stupid question Godless people ask

'Can God make a rock more powerful than him that it can destroy him?'

You answer no then how can he be God? You answer 'yes' then it shows he's can't be God as there is something more powerful than him.

There's been plenty warnings against this kind of Heathen thinking...it's best Atheists don't waste everyone's time by trying to justify their own beliefs....because you're all going to be a long time waiting if you think God is going to sell himself to you so you can have faith.

Carry on worshiping your football clubs lads...it's a good level for you.

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
I see there's a picture of Mars now with a white section at the bottom depicting water <laugh>

Bunch of ****ing idiots...wonder how wrong they are with everything else. It lookedlo bit different in my Physics book at School.

Then again I'm more concerned about the Gender neutral agenda taking place at our kids schools...confusing them and giving them long term mental issues. Wish they would **** off shoving dickless boys and girls with bigger clits than dicks into my life.

Motherless bastards
 
Never heard such a stupid question like 'who created God'

He wouldn't be God if he was created <doh>

The question should be : how/why did God come into being ??


"'Can God make a rock more powerful than him that it can destroy him?'

You answer no then how can he be God? You answer 'yes' then it shows he's can't be God as there is something more powerful than him."

If you answer :

1. no, then you are stating that their powers have limits.

2. yes, then you are stating that their powers COULD create
something more powerful than them (and the risks to them therein) .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
This <ok>

Science might not be 100% accurate, but at least it attempts to be and actively tries disprove it's own theories in order to give them rigour. In that way it can be considered the closest explanation to what we can call fact.

I think Religion and Faith have a place, but more for a moral code (although some of it is highly questionable) and guide for living your life, but I do not think Religion does a good job at trying to explain how the universe came into existence.

In some ways the pseudo scientists and crackpots are worse than Religious leaders, because they try to present their ideas as fact, when they are based in little more than faith.


Not sure this is accurate.

Sounds like the creationists to me