The Breakfast Debate

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
This new guy is someone who would and could have been stolen by any decent team if he was any good. A £400k release fee isn’t large and I bet Barnsley are over the moon, they probably tipped Orta off themselves as it saves sacking him.

Here we have a guy who has had to sit there watching players be sold without a say in any of it. It stands to reason he is willing to be Ortas puppet, when officially announced Orta will say he will be consulted on all future signings, some will believe this and hit him with it when he is blamed for not getting the best out of the dross Orta signs.

Will I support him yes, am I expecting anything better out of him than Thomas, no...
 
So, couple of questions...

Anybody know what type of football Heckinbottom tries to get his teams to play? If he's hoping to lump balls up to the big strikers he's coming to the wrong place.

If he fails and Orta gets the chop, Radz might sign another DoF. Is the problem Orta or the DoF approach altogether?
Barnsley always try to play football,he built a good team who got sold off,he did well there,so will give him a fair shot.
 
Two ex-professional footballers are facing jail for scamming £5million from schools and colleges through a bogus sports leadership scheme.

Hampshire's Sparsholt College was one of the victims of former Wales international Mark Aizlewood, 57, and Paul Sugrue, 56 - whose past clubs include Manchester City, Middlesbrough and Cardiff City - promised to help struggling youngsters gain an NVQ in activity leadership.

They told colleges across the country they would provide full-time training in football coaching as well as work experience and a £95 weekly stipend to 3,800 students.

But in reality, hundreds of the students on their books didn't even exist, many lived at the opposite end of the country from the training scheme, while others were doing just two to three hours of study a week.

Today Aizlewood was convicted of one count and Sugrue of two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation by offering the non-existent apprenticeships through their firm Luis Michael Training Ltd at Southwark Crown Court in London.

Aizlewood was acquitted of a second court of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation.

The pair - along with fellow directors Keith Williams, 45, and Christopher Martin, 53 - submitted false accounts to colleges to persuade them to do business with the firm.

They promised the colleges it was the perfect opportunity for "NEETs", or youngsters not in employment, education or training, to gain a qualification.

Williams was also convicted of two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation.

Football coach Jack Harper, 30, was convicted of fraud and using a false instrument. He was acquitted of another count of conspiracy to commit false representation.

Martin admitted two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation ahead of trial, along with Stephen Gooding, 53, who admitted one charge.

Judge Michael Tomlinson described the case as "very serious" and adjourned sentencing until February 26.

The company enrolled suitable apprentices to claim money from the colleges, which in turn received funding from the Government-run Learning and Skills Council (LSC), later renamed the Skills Funding Agency (SFA).

Gooding and Harper, who were employed in the business, helped funnel new learners into the scheme.

Some of the bogus students were sourced from a summer football camp run by Harper, who secretly enrolled students to apprenticeships without their knowledge or consent.

When the scam unravelled, the Skills Funding Agency demanded its money back, leaving large deficits in the budgets of many schools.

Aizlewood denied any wrongdoing, telling the jury he had been preoccupied by his late wife's spiralling mental health problems before her suicide in June last year.

He told the court he had neither the "time or inclination" to carry out such a complex fraud during the period.
 
This new guy is someone who would and could have been stolen by any decent team if he was any good. A £400k release fee isn’t large and I bet Barnsley are over the moon, they probably tipped Orta off themselves as it saves sacking him.

Here we have a guy who has had to sit there watching players be sold without a say in any of it. It stands to reason he is willing to be Ortas puppet, when officially announced Orta will say he will be consulted on all future signings, some will believe this and hit him with it when he is blamed for not getting the best out of the dross Orta signs.

Will I support him yes, am I expecting anything better out of him than Thomas, no...
Well Ristac don't get too despondent it could have been the Wally with the brolly and at least he knows the league and he seems a very decent guy to me taking time out to visit old people perhaps he will visit our friend in his rest home .Now that would be something!
 
Well Ristac don't get too despondent it could have been the Wally with the brolly and at least he knows the league and he seems a very decent guy to me taking time out to visit old people perhaps he will visit our friend in his rest home .Now that would be something!
I'll bet he won't go see Glory if he reads what he's been saying about him on here<ok>
 
Well Ristac don't get too despondent it could have been the Wally with the brolly and at least he knows the league and he seems a very decent guy to me taking time out to visit old people perhaps he will visit our friend in his rest home .Now that would be something!
I'll back him 110% and if he fails I won't blame him, I will blame Orta for wasting £400k when we could have waited a couple of weeks and picked him up when he was due to sign on, it beggars belief how anyone knew he had a £400k release fee, I am just bewildered how he was first choice. We swap someone with no wins in 7 for no wins in 6 and as someone else pointed out, this is the guy who signed Mowatt

I admit he has done better as caretaker but whilst in the role on a permanent basis his record:
Barnsley
83 games
23 wins
23 draws
37 defeats
27.7% win percentage

Thomas who has just been sacked at Leeds
35 games
15 wins
6 draws
14 defeats
42.9% win percentage

I just can't see how this is an improvement, I so hope I am wrong
 
Last edited:
I'll back him 110% and if he fails I won't blame him, I will blame Orta for wasting £400k when we could have waited a couple of weeks and picked him up when he was due to sign on, it beggars belief how anyone knew he had a £400k release fee, I am just bewildered how he was first choice. We swap someone with no wins in 7 for no wins in 6 and as someone else pointed out, this is the guy who signed Mowatt

I admit he has done better as caretaker but whilst in the role on a permanent basis his record:
Barnsley
83 games
23 wins
23 draws
37 defeats
27.7% win percentage

Thomas who has just been sacked at Leeds
35 games
15 wins
6 draws
14 defeats
42.9% win percentage

I just can't see how this is an improvement, I so hope I am wrong

Carlos Carvahal got sacked by the wendies and he's not doing too bad at swansea.
 
Heckingbottom has a great record in Division One as a caretaker boss, Redfearn also had a great record as a caretaker boss.

In this division as a permanent boss on a rolling contract he has an abysmal record.
 
I'd have welcomed him as our next coach, I'm genuinely not sure what your point is? Carvahal had a win percentage of 42.7% when he got the sack.

He was on a losing streak when sacked and had a massively bigger budget. All questioned how he got a premier league job after being sacked by a championship club. Maybe Heck can do better with better players is all I was getting at (if we have better players of course).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ristac
This is the reason why TC had to go...8 headless chickens all at the front post.

This was at 0-0 and was absolutely disgraceful organization and defending.
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
 
I'll back him 110% and if he fails I won't blame him, I will blame Orta for wasting £400k when we could have waited a couple of weeks and picked him up when he was due to sign on, it beggars belief how anyone knew he had a £400k release fee, I am just bewildered how he was first choice. We swap someone with no wins in 7 for no wins in 6 and as someone else pointed out, this is the guy who signed Mowatt

I admit he has done better as caretaker but whilst in the role on a permanent basis his record:
Barnsley
83 games
23 wins
23 draws
37 defeats
27.7% win percentage

Thomas who has just been sacked at Leeds
35 games
15 wins
6 draws
14 defeats
42.9% win percentage

I just can't see how this is an improvement, I so hope I am wrong
What the stats don't tell you is he took a team in the bottom 3 of the first division and transformed them over night having taken over from Lee Johnson and gained promotion.He then took Barnsley to 7 just after Christmas and then lost 5 of his best players to Villa Swansea etc .With no money to spend the results were not good but he never complained
He's English and a well repected coach particularly of young stars of the future I wish him well
 
We've had the same restriction for 25-30 years,not a big deal.And never stops us selling out every away game.
The fact that Leeds are a one city club, the fact that in the 70's and 80's Leeds were the only Yorkshire side that had any success and the fact that Leeds have support all over the country i would expect nothing less.
 
Also 13 clubs to choose from, many highly successful so not many glory hunters at the Den, just real passionate fans.
Many highly successful ? are you going by millwall won fook all to come up with that statement ? I would say Chelsea, yes,Arsenal and Spurs slightly successful,the rest you're pushing it,with most like millwall crappy little clubs,not many glory hunters no,in fact not many of fans full stop and a lot less when it comes to traveling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FORZA LEEDS
Many highly successful ? are you going by millwall won fook all to come up with that statement ? I would say Chelsea, yes,Arsenal and Spurs slightly successful,the rest you're pushing it,with most like millwall crappy little clubs,not many glory hunters no,in fact not many of fans full stop and a lot less when it comes to traveling.
In Leeds' case the fact that they have more fans than most other clubs just means more people are upset when little side beat them, as stats prove it doesn't matter how many fans you have in the stands on the pitch it is 11 verses 11(or 10 when Leeds are playing<laugh>)