The Tymon question

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I dont agree, we are all getting carried away in the 'one of our own nonsense', he got bullied last week and would be targeted again.
At no point have I ever said one of our own. Ever.

My view is based on his performance and commitment. He's not going to learn sitting on his arse. We have **** all to lose.

I'd start him. Because I think he's good enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
if tymon starts, put robertson on the left of midfield
they would work well together i feel and robertson will be much more effective attacking
 
if tymon starts, put robertson on the left of midfield
they would work well together i feel and robertson will be much more effective attacking

People have been proposing this for two years now. It's still a daft idea.
 
what asking tymon to start? wasn't he 15

No. Playing Robertson on the wing. His whole strength is bursting from deep. It'd nullify him the same way that sticking Aluko up front with his back to goal did.
 
At no point have I ever said one of our own. Ever.

My view is based on his performance and commitment. He's not going to learn sitting on his arse. We have **** all to lose.

I'd start him. Because I think he's good enough.

Everycunt and his daft **** dog know's we're down this season anyway. Give the lad a proper run of games, we've nothing to lose.
 
At no point have I ever said one of our own. Ever.

My view is based on his performance and commitment. He's not going to learn sitting on his arse. We have **** all to lose.

I'd start him. Because I think he's good enough.

He was exposed last weekend, luckily the team we were playing were awful and didn't take advantage, he'll get torn apart against most teams in this league.

The only reason to play him is because we have no one else, which, luckily for him is the case right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerbalm
He was exposed last weekend, luckily the team we were playing were awful and didn't take advantage, he'll get torn apart against most teams in this league.

The only reason to play him is because we have no one else, which, luckily for him is the case right now.
Marshalls been exposed since he first started for us. He gets selected every game.

Elmo's been exposed at RB since he's been misplayed there. He gets selected every game.

Almost all of our players have been exposed in the past 8 or so games. Seasoned pros.

It'll do him good, he doesn't need wrapping up in cotton wool, he needs game time and experience.

Get him on and gerrinintoem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
All this square pegs in round holes is bollocks. Last week everyone was in their Football Manager approved 'correct' position and we got absolutely ****ed.
 
He was exposed last weekend, luckily the team we were playing were awful and didn't take advantage, he'll get torn apart against most teams in this league.

The only reason to play him is because we have no one else, which, luckily for him is the case right now.
100% correct he got bummed off a ****e Sunderland team. 20 mins in today and just as bad get him off
 
That doesn't mean playing people out of position is better

Every manager does it and fans always moan. There's got to be a reason they keep doing it. Maybe it's because those they know positions aren't as set in stone as people think they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cortez91
Every manager does it and fans always moan. There's got to be a reason they keep doing it. Maybe it's because those they know positions aren't as set in stone as people think they are.

I think you're right.

I don't think most modern footballers has/can have one position these days. Even if it's subtle like playing in a back four or back three - it's a position change.