The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I read this on another forum, and thought it was rather good,

"
For those of you on the left I know it is hard. You are confused, bewildered and deeply, deeply saddened. Maybe even triggered. You probably missed work or school yesterday, called in sick or simply didn’t get out of bed. That’s ok though because your Indigenous Women’s Studies prof said it was ok to skip the exam today. Everyone is getting an A as a morale builder. So cheer up.
...


And while I’ve never considered myself much of a right winger, being more of a libertarian bent, I have found myself increasingly pushed and marginalized by the “enlightened and progressive” amongst you into the same camp with all sorts of deplorables, regardless of where they lived and what they called themselves. Nationalists, alt righters, anarchists, constitutionalists and so on and so forth all made for strange bedfellows but an effective team. Working on the premise that the enemy of my enemy is my friend we have all found common ground. We have you to thank for that. By pushing, badgering, harassing, marginalizing and insulting us on a regular basis you created something new. And it crushed you at the ballot box.

...

But not to worry. There will be plenty of opportunities for you to learn from your mistakes. You see, the battle that took place in your polling stations on the 8th of November was just that. A battle. We, the freedom loving peoples of the western world, well, we’re just getting warmed up. To quote the man: “You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet“.

So retreat to your safe spaces, grab your adult colouring books and put on a happy face my special snow flakes because regardless of whoever/whatever you are and regardless of what nation it is you reside in, we, the deplorables, are coming for you.

"
It just shows up everything that's wrong with the alt-right, including their hypocrisy and failure to grasp facts.
Trump didn't win because he mobilised a group of bigots. Clinton lost because she failed to keep Obama's voters.
Romney would've won this election comfortably, even if he'd have just maintained his figures from 2012.

Safe spaces? Try The Donald on Reddit, the place where Trump himself did his Ask Me Anything interview with his fans.
Rule 6: No Dissenters. The ultimate safe space, where you aren't allowed to question the narrative.
No questioning the authoritarian figurehead please, as he's rather fragile.

My favourite part was something that you left out, though:
"I realized early on that the battle between Trump and Clinton was much more than simply a contest between two politicians for the presidency.
At its core was it was an ideological conflict between light and dark, truth and lies."

If you're in a battle between good and evil and you're on Trump's side, then you know you ****ed up! <laugh>
Trump objectively lies far more than virtually anyone in the public eye. It's constant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-than-all-the-other-2016-candidates-combined/
His supporters don't care.
 
I think the explanation for Trump's success is very simple. He was the far right candidate at a time when there is a lot of sympathy among ordinary people for right wing policies and a mistrust of liberals. Anyone who is prepared to say publicly what many think privately - Muslims are terrorists, immigrants are parasites who are taking our jobs, America will be great again if we deal with these common enemies swiftly and robustly etc - is guaranteed their vote whatever their other shortcomings.
 
I think the explanation for Trump's success is very simple. He was the far right candidate at a time when there is a lot of sympathy among ordinary people for right wing policies and a mistrust of liberals. Anyone who is prepared to say publicly what many think privately - Muslims are terrorists, immigrants are parasites who are taking our jobs, America will be great again if we deal with these common enemies swiftly and robustly etc - is guaranteed their vote whatever their other shortcomings.
I think it's even more simple than that: it was the Republicans' turn.
The US tends to give each party two terms, then switches to the other for two terms, for some reason.
I think that they're just generally pissed off with their current government at all times.
 
It just shows up everything that's wrong with the alt-right, including their hypocrisy and failure to grasp facts.
Trump didn't win because he mobilised a group of bigots. Clinton lost because she failed to keep Obama's voters.
Romney would've won this election comfortably, even if he'd have just maintained his figures from 2012.

Safe spaces? Try The Donald on Reddit, the place where Trump himself did his Ask Me Anything interview with his fans.
Rule 6: No Dissenters. The ultimate safe space, where you aren't allowed to question the narrative.
No questioning the authoritarian figurehead please, as he's rather fragile.

My favourite part was something that you left out, though:
"I realized early on that the battle between Trump and Clinton was much more than simply a contest between two politicians for the presidency.
At its core was it was an ideological conflict between light and dark, truth and lies."

If you're in a battle between good and evil and you're on Trump's side, then you know you ****ed up! <laugh>
Trump objectively lies far more than virtually anyone in the public eye. It's constant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-than-all-the-other-2016-candidates-combined/
His supporters don't care.


SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT

<applause>
 
I've read that a small town in Kentucky called Rabbitt Hash(?) has just elected a dog as mayor.I've got to stop reading this junk!
 
Twitter's also banned a bunch of people: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37997864
I can see what they're trying to do, but is this the way to do it? I'm not convinced that it is.
Given they're saying they'll start their new Twitter, with blackjack and hookers (in fact screw the blackjack!) - the exact same stance that notable moron Louise Mensch took when starting Menshn, which closed within eight months of startup - the question is how long before they start crawling back to Twitter promising they'll behave?
 
Given they're saying they'll start their new Twitter, with blackjack and hookers (in fact screw the blackjack!) - the exact same stance that notable moron Louise Mensch took when starting Menshn, which closed within eight months of startup - the question is how long before they start crawling back to Twitter promising they'll behave?
They're in a far better position to do it, though.
Starting one might not be the obvious solution, but adopting an already existing one? Perfectly plausible.
Jumping to Tumblr would be rather ironic, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spur of the Moment
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38021820

So, the new President-elect pays out $25m to settle these lawsuits.
"The organisation was not an accredited university or college. It did not confer college credit, grant degrees, or grade its students. In 2011, the company became the subject of an inquiry by the New York Attorney General's office for illegal business practices that resulted in these lawsuits filed in 2013
The lawsuits Centre on allegations that Trump University defrauded its students by using misleading marketing practices and engaging in aggressive sales tactics."

No reason then to worry about this guy running the 'free world'