The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought we were discussing your close friendship with Roland Gift <laugh>


Nope, it's about you imparting the depth of your knowledge of the EU/Brexit situation, which I suspect you're actually doing.

Come on, the world awaits. It's your opportunity to prove you're not some irrelevant no mark and you really hang around here because you actually have a point on the topic, not just because even abuse beats being ignored.
 
So Trump is already backtracking on Obamacare.

Surely the first politician in history to be elected to high office without a single actual policy? It gives the Sensible Party a chance!

God bless 'Merica!
 
Nope, it's about you imparting the depth of your knowledge of the EU/Brexit situation, which I suspect you're actually doing.

Come on, the world awaits. It's your opportunity to prove you're not some irrelevant no mark and you really hang around here because you actually have a point on the topic, not just because even abuse beats being ignored.
Did Roland let you stroke his blanket while you lectured him about non whites and blacks? <laugh>
 
Where did I say he was wrong?

This really IS pointless. You're arguing a claim I never made, and expecting me to defend it. In doing that YOU are cluttering the thread up in the very way you're complaining about.

I said you accused him of being wrong or limited. I'm not complaining about you avoiding explaining why but am just trying to understand why you wouldn't bother to do so but do bother to spend so much time warbling on about nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pieguts and Stan
Where did I say he was wrong?

This really IS pointless. You're arguing a claim I never made, and expecting me to defend it. In doing that YOU are cluttering the thread up in the very way you're complaining about.

Your comment was along the lines of "that's one version of the truth" or something like that. Again, it's a subtle way for you to be able to continue to write replies such as above.

Now that really is pointless......
 
I said you accused him of being wrong or limited. I'm not complaining about you avoiding explaining why but am just trying to understand why you wouldn't bother to do so but do bother to spend so much time warbling on about nothing.
The girls from the chat lines have stopped taking his calls.
 
So Trump is already backtracking on Obamacare.

Surely the first politician in history to be elected to high office without a single actual policy? It gives the Sensible Party a chance!

God bless 'Merica!

It is funny how those who voted for him are quickly seeing he's just much of a politician as the politicians they were protest voting against.

It's one thing screaming from the rooftops about how **** politicians are, and then another, having to bend over when you become one!
 
The failure is in inadequate regulation.

You must understand that the people who create these 'exotics' as they're called, or derivatives to those outside, are in many cases PhD's in applied maths from Oxbridge and such like. These are the guys who are called the rocket scientists. They use their skills to create ever more complex and complicated ( and in many cases, highly volatile and high risk) strategies. Very profitable when they go as they predict the markets will go, but explosively dangerous when they don't!

Now, this is all fine so long as it's properly regulated. It wasn't, and still isn't! Why? Well, firstly, let's go back to the core of that problem, you can't regulate what you don't begin to understand. So, there's the heart of the problem. Why don't the compliance depts of the banks and the FSA employ people who do understand these products? Quite simply because they are paid millions a year. Unless and until the regulators step up and lure some of these people to turn gamekeeper, the problem will continue.

I don't disagree with any of that. What I would say is that it needs taking back a step further and the system that it opporates in needs looking at too.

As it stands, the system is not based on money, but on currency that is created by generating debt. In my view, it's unsustainable to do that, as it needs more debt to feed it. We're building up massive problems for future generations.
 
I said you accused him of being wrong or limited. I'm not complaining about you avoiding explaining why but am just trying to understand why you wouldn't bother to do so but do bother to spend so much time warbling on about nothing.

Your comment was along the lines of "that's one version of the truth" or something like that. Again, it's a subtle way for you to be able to continue to write replies such as above.

Now that really is pointless......

EDIT, I'll lump these together to save clutter, as they're both rattling on about the same bit of tedious **** all.

The 'warbling on about nothing' tends to be replying to posts like yours abusing dead horses. I never accused him of being wrong, I simply pointed out that there's more too it, but that I wouldn't be elaborating. The rest is others dragging this out well past the point of tedium, for their own peculiar reasons.
 
I watched The Agenda with Loach and Abbott
They were asked what Corbyn's policies were but Abbott said they were still discussing what they were
Loach said that people didn't know what his policies were because of the "fascist" newspapers but he wasn't able to say what they were either
 
I watched The Agenda with Loach and Abbott
They were asked what Corbyn's policies were but Abbott said they were still discussing what they were
Loach said that people didn't know what his policies were because of the "fascist" newspapers but he wasn't able to say what they were either
What are the Sensible Party's policies?
 
I watched The Agenda with Loach and Abbott
They were asked what Corbyn's policies were but Abbott said they were still discussing what they were
Loach said that people didn't know what his policies were because of the "fascist" newspapers but he wasn't able to say what they were either

You must log in or register to see media
 
I don't disagree with any of that. What I would say is that it needs taking back a step further and the system that it opporates in needs looking at too.

As it stands, the system is not based on money, but on currency that is created by generating debt. In my view, it's unsustainable to do that, as it needs more debt to feed it. We're building up massive problems for future generations.

That's Gvt borrowing, the level of which in all cases is a result of the incumbent and previous Gvt's policies.

What I'm talking about is something completely separate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.