The EU debate - Part III

Nope, it's about you imparting the depth of your knowledge of the EU/Brexit situation, which I suspect you're actually doing.

Come on, the world awaits. It's your opportunity to prove you're not some irrelevant no mark and you really hang around here because you actually have a point on the topic, not just because even abuse beats being ignored.

 

So Trump is already backtracking on Obamacare.

Surely the first politician in history to be elected to high office without a single actual policy? It gives the Sensible Party a chance!

God bless 'Merica!

 

Did Roland let you stroke his blanket while you lectured him about non whites and blacks?

 

I said you accused him of being wrong or limited. I'm not complaining about you avoiding explaining why but am just trying to understand why you wouldn't bother to do so but do bother to spend so much time warbling on about nothing.

 

Your comment was along the lines of "that's one version of the truth" or something like that. Again, it's a subtle way for you to be able to continue to write replies such as above.

Now that really is pointless......

 

The girls from the chat lines have stopped taking his calls.

 

It is funny how those who voted for him are quickly seeing he's just much of a politician as the politicians they were protest voting against.

It's one thing screaming from the rooftops about how **** politicians are, and then another, having to bend over when you become one!

 

I don't disagree with any of that. What I would say is that it needs taking back a step further and the system that it opporates in needs looking at too.

As it stands, the system is not based on money, but on currency that is created by generating debt. In my view, it's unsustainable to do that, as it needs more debt to feed it. We're building up massive problems for future generations.

 

Breaking news:

Nicola Sturgeon says she doesn't agree with the England Vs Scotland result and wants a re-match.

 

EDIT, I'll lump these together to save clutter, as they're both rattling on about the same bit of tedious **** all.

The 'warbling on about nothing' tends to be replying to posts like yours abusing dead horses. I never accused him of being wrong, I simply pointed out that there's more too it, but that I wouldn't be elaborating. The rest is others dragging this out well past the point of tedium, for their own peculiar reasons.

 

Is that a Kustard original?

 

I watched The Agenda with Loach and Abbott
They were asked what Corbyn's policies were but Abbott said they were still discussing what they were
Loach said that people didn't know what his policies were because of the "fascist" newspapers but he wasn't able to say what they were either

 

There's loads more to it but I won't be elaborating.

 

Dont be stupid, its spelt correct

 

Good. It wasn't that interesting or meaningful to start with.

 

What are the Sensible Party's policies?

 

Dull owned yet again

 

Did you get someone who speaks English to do it?

 

That's Gvt borrowing, the level of which in all cases is a result of the incumbent and previous Gvt's policies.

What I'm talking about is something completely separate.