And that logic would apply to the EU, too...All Brits can live anywhere in the UK as it is, why change it?
so For free travel from me![]()

And that logic would apply to the EU, too...All Brits can live anywhere in the UK as it is, why change it?
so For free travel from me![]()

I thought that it was just a rant about Asians taking over certain areas, due to their numbers.If he's saying that then what's does he think are the issues raised in the article that he referred to?
The Mail is coming at it from the angle that there's no honkies in the area as they've all done one due to the Asians moving in. If that's just 'free choice' to him, then what's the beef?
And that logic would apply to the EU, too...![]()
I thought that it was just a rant about Asians taking over certain areas, due to their numbers.
Not sure what his point is if it isn't that, to be honest. Not sure what he wants to do about if if it is.
Probably north of 80% the same as Herr Zlatan the confused immigrant.What percentage of the population needs to be white for Pete to deem it "acceptable"?
No, it isn't. You said that a group of people are free to move between countries now, so why change it?No, totally different.
Pete must hate it round where he lives then!Probably north of 80% the same as Herr Zlatan the confused immigrant.
Pete must hate it round where he lives then!
Even more ironic that the money for his sausages is generated by renting out rooms to immigrants in his HMO slum.Ironically he's keeping the Polish butcher in business single-handedly.
No, it isn't. You said that a group of people are free to move between countries now, so why change it?
That would apply to the EU, too.
You may have other reasons, but the one that you presented isn't totally different.
I understand that you're against it, but your reason for keeping freedom of movement in the UK would apply to the EU.Free to move from within the UK, I am not talking about the EU
So if you are talking about the EU then the answer is no to free movement
I understand that you're against it, but your reason for keeping freedom of movement in the UK would apply to the EU.
I assume that you have other reasons.
So you'd be alright with a cap that limited the number of people entering the UK from the EU then?Its down to control, thats all I ask, to many coming in too fast is not good for anyone.
Kustard, love the new sig, although I can guarantee that I never referred to myself as a property magnet![]()
![]()
You're the dumbest **** I've ever encountered, either in person or online!! Priceless!!![]()
Maybe not property, but you are a pussy magnetKustard, love the new sig, although I can guarantee that I never referred to myself as a property magnet![]()
![]()
You're the dumbest **** I've ever encountered, either in person or online!! Priceless!!![]()
There is a good article on the LSE blogs that explains that numbers aren't actually controlled at the borders, but in the work place.So you'd be alright with a cap that limited the number of people entering the UK from the EU then?
If so, what would that number be?
"When a dozen doctors tell you to sit down, you should sit down.Maybe not property, but you are a pussy magnet
You've attracted tobes, nsis, pnp, watford, pieguts, paultheplug, fosse and several others. Pussies one and all![]()
He's living in the UK and I assume he's a British citizen so I am talking about the UKThe butcher's from India, so not really, eh?
I assume that you mean the UK too, not just one country. Maybe not, though.
Are you for or against the free travel of British people?