The EU debate - Part III

I haven't changed the direction at all, I pointed out that the figures were rising before brexit, and then proved it. That's a key factor in any discussion as it points to where the problem is. Trying to lump it on brexit is just desperate.

It's not as clear as you claim, and the percentage claim is for anonymous, unsubstantiated claims, but I'll humour you and say ok they have.

Now, what's your solution?

 

Solutions are another matter for another day.

I have a heavy gym session tomorrow morning and I'm going to bed now.

 

Thought not.

Happy googling.

 

The figures have increased markedly since the Brexit vote. There's nothing desperate about it. Only a fool, or a bigot with an agenda would try to deny otherwise.

As to whether it existed before the vote, of course it did. Bigotry, race hatred, and xenophobia are nothing new. Not now, or ever!..

Your persistent, and clearly obvious attempts to deny the obvious, because it doesn't fit your agenda, just add to your self portrayal of what you really are.

A sad old bigot!...

 

Nice of you to sign the end of your post.

Now off you pop, it's your solution you're looking for.

 

Point out exactly where I called what you posted this morning bollocks, you bullshitting gobshite

Your position has been that of someone trying to mislead, deflect and belittle the point about post Brexit race hate crime

 

I never called it bollocks you pathetic strawman ****

 

Happy to oblige Worzel. No doubt you'll claim you meant something else, but your further replies tell the story.

http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-iii.335684/page-504#post-9861598

 

Pfftf, you think you calling it ****e rather than bollocks wins the argument?

You ****ed up again Worzel. Deal with it.

 

Nice work Hull. Yet again you have managed to swat away these semi literate whiners with ease.

Walter Mitty has trotted off to stop his nose bleed and tourettes is pacing his room waiting for the snide to feed him his next lines.

Marvellous stuff

 

The discussion started this morning and your deflection and apologist ****e started then.you spent half an hour posting QED you complete joke.

Point out what I said to you this morning and find the post that says I called the fact that race hate crime wasn't on the up and your cut and paste posts bollocks? Crack on.

You clearly said I'd called it bollocks from the off and changed my tune, when I did nothing of the sort.

You however stared with the moral high ground attempt - standard, then moved onto spam, then posted figures about prior years which didn't alter the FACT that hate crime had hugely increased post the referendum (which was the ****ing dicussion point) why? Because your a far right bigot, that's why.

Trump
Islam
Leave
Denying immigration was a prime factor
UKIP
Squirming around the issue of race hate crime increasing
Failing to call out blatant racists like Zlatan
In fact trying to have a pop at those who did

But of course you're not a far right racist **** - honest

 

Surprised to see you hanging out of his arse, you fletching ****wit

 

What have the Irish got planned for you tomorrow?

Labouring at Embassy Gardens? Or will they send you up to Manchester to tidy up the Piccadilly Tower car park?

Whatever they instruct you to do, you'll be seething while you sweat to make them a few quid (although I doubt you're selling much kit at the minute).

Word of advice, get your God's Cock on the block and do your own deals instead of hiding behind the foreigners you hate. Even at your age you're not too old to become an organ grinder instead of a monkey.

 

Worzel, that's ****e spinning even for you.

The discussion about bollocks was clearly about the comment that lead to me posting the graph. You're just trying to deflect attention from your **** up, and not only failing, but actually highlighting it. You posting your standard inaccurate and irrelevant bollocks as a diversion hardly helps your argument.

No twisting or deflection on my part, my argument from the get go has been the same. I'll copy it again.

Your 48% doesn't show crime has increased. It's reports of crime that includes anonymous and unsubstantiated claims, some of which have been shown to be neither brexit nor race related.

Over and above that, brexit didn't cause the mind set. Earlier failed policies did.

 

Up a bit late aren't you, ****tard?

You'll need to be up early to catch the morning cattle car off to your sad little job..

 

You talk so much ****e!..

There is a mountain of evidence both actual and anecdotal that incidences of racial and xenophobic attacks have increased markedly since the Brexit vote.

Trying to hide behind the excuse that it was happening before the vote shows you for what you really are. A far right, bigot and racist. What's laughable is that you seem to think that nobody has worked out where you're coming from.

Even fellow leavers, like Bod and Watford have disowned you and your ilk.

You're more than happy to support anything and everything that supports your bigots agenda - including backing up that blatant racist, Zlatan. And equally happy to try and decry or deny anything that doesn't fit with your warped ideas.

 

I'm guessing that piss poor attempt at a diversion means Google hasn't thrown up the solution you were supposedly going to post.

 

There is a mountain of evidence on Google and elsewhere. I've posted some, I can post much more. But you already know that.

The only attempts at diversion are yours, as per usual!..

 

Of course Brexit itself didn't cause racists to become racists you stupid ****

What it did was give them a sense of validation and race hate crime increased - the end

I note you're still squirming around trying to say a 48% increase doesn't mean race crime crime has gone up either - which is where we ****ing started, but you didn't deny it had gone up did you? Oh wait.

 

You can repeat the same thing as much as you like, my answer doesn't change until you post something new.

Anyway ladies, enough of your diversions, it's the solution you were looking for.