Off Topic Vote - HIAG's best wum **** up

Pete has your number Sock-Dodger

 

Fosse. I've answered enough of your questions now, its about time you answered mine and then I will answer yours.

All I'm asking is for your opinion on GM's comments to matt th e other day. Its simple

Do you condemn him or not. Yes or no

 

Do you condemn any comments mocking innocent defenceless children with autism i.e. Calling them window lickers etc.?

 

... let me know whethe you'll be supporting a call for a HIAG ban and then I'll happily share my views on a specific post ... can you quote it after you've answered the bannig point? ... that will make life easier

 

Apparenlty, Pete has been making an arse of himself on online forums since 2004. PNP dug out a pearler from somebody giving him short shrift over another subject he knew nothing about from 12 years ago !

 

These are your words, Fosse, not mine. I've answered your questions about my opinion towards HIAG's status and his comments towards Autism, while you refuse to answer my one simple question. I will answer your next one once you answer mine.

So, do you condemn Skiddy's comments towards matt the other day, Yes or no ?

 

Do you condemn any comments mocking innocent defenceless children with autism i.e. Calling them window lickers etc.?

 

Links, please.

If Pixie has already made the link(s), then it should be a simple enough process for you to copy and paste them.

Please do not bottle this, Skiddy.

 

Go away, dog. Here is what I have to say about answering your question

I will continue to answer fosse and piskie's though. But only once they've answered mine.

 

• No, I don't think so, but only because Skiddy is a far more stupid version of Pixie (if you can imagine that!), and I don't think that Pixie has the creative skills necessary to create a simpleton like Skiddy.
• No, clearly not to any sane person.
• This is now getting ridiculous, RCL!
• Jesus wept!
• I am now calling the police!

 

I say don't bother with Skiddy anymore mate. I've documented the filth he directed the other day at matt and now unbelievably he thinks he can talk about the subject from some sort of moral highground !

 

Don't have too chump he's already posted it. I see you have two windows open tonight! I'm impressed you have the savvy to do that. Just answer Piskie question, no bottling it now!

 

Do you condemn any comments mocking innocent defenceless children with autism i.e. Calling them window lickers etc.?
A simple YES or NO will suffice.

 

Dog

 

For the third time of asking, please post a link to the alleged "window lickers" comment.

A third refusal will prove what everyone already knows - that you are bullshitting in order to avoid due and proper censure for your appalling remarks made against Matth.

 

I'm not going to bother asking you for a fourth time.

You cannot link to any such posts because no such posts exist.

Stop making false claims about me. The fact that you have resorted to such base tactics is as abhorrent as the appalling comments that you directed at Matth.

 

You're asking skiddy for something and he immediately runs to his master piskie, what a surprise

The only time he didn't have Piskie holding his hand was when he savagely used another poster's aspergers diagnosis as a stick to beat him with. He does however now need piskie to try and pretend these comments towards matt were never made. He's a dog, pure and simple

 

... I think you must have had a technical issue with the 'Reply' button ... you've inadvertently left out half of my initial question ... the one that you are claiming to have answered ... I've therfore taken the time to reproduce my post and have highlighted in bold the bit that you have inadvertently missed... I think it is important that you have this opportunity to fully answer; otherwise some less charitable than me might just think that the omission was some form of avoidance or deflection ... for the avoidance of doubt, you haven't yet addressed the bit in bold despite several requests

 

I cannot be bothered to dig out the exact quote but my response was that while I didn't find HIAG's comments particularly tasteful they are not, for me, in same realm as using someone's diagnosis as a means of demeaning and abusing them.Feel free to disagree, as is your right, with what I have in bold but that is how I myself feel about comparing the two issues and I am not alone in that. I've answered your question and you cannot just dismiss it because it's not what you wanted to hear.

You, however decided to completely shun my question with regards skiddy's comments and have continued to ask questions of me which I will answer once you answer mine, as you've previously said you wanted the exchange to operate.

 

That's what it does Fosse HIAB only picks the bits he wants. Thinks it's being clever but we all know different. Tell me mate what's difficult with this question?
Do you condemn any comments mocking innocent defenceless children with autism i.e. Calling them window lickers etc.? ****ed if I know but he'll never answer it!