Not only that, the horse did not actually start as fav SBC - so under the terms of the system that would mean a 'no bet' surely?
I think Barney's system was to back outright top weights. Being fav or not doesn't matter.
Not only that, the horse did not actually start as fav SBC - so under the terms of the system that would mean a 'no bet' surely?
No qualifier in the claimer at Catterick Bridge on Saturday as there are joint top weights in that one. So the only runner for the system in w/c 10 October is the above mentioned AWAIT THE STORM tomorrow.

10th of 11 Barney. OK?Fair point, Ron. Although the only runner, from that category thus far, was beaten just half a length. Shall we give it a couple more races from the 2YO brigade and then have a look at how it has gone re a firm decision???
That looks right ChanIf I understand this system correctly there's a qualifying racing tomorrow at Windsor. 2.20 Caitie 9/1.
??Which is??![]()
If I understand this system correctly there's a qualifying racing tomorrow at Windsor. 2.20 Caitie 9/1.
Ah. HereThanks Ron but I meant the system![]()
That's avoided another loserThe other problem barney (as mentioned here) is older horses. Today's race will be a test as there are two 7 year olds in today's qualifier.
Much as I have suggested excluding 2yo races, I would also suggest excluding any race where at least one of the runners is aged 6 or over. As mentioned in the post, "Not many people are interested in buying older horses so they can get dropped in on a handy weight knowing they won't get bought."