It's not crossed the line, you can't have a no religion rule, then let people discuss the details of the gospels ffs.
It's the people in the gospels. We have a no politics rule, but still discuss the outcomes of decisions by politicians, particularly City Centre stuff.
It's not about religion specifically, it's about the historicity of a figure in scripture. You fail to make the distinction because you're thick.
Maybe when they perfect time travel we can go back and have a look? Or maybe any shape shifting terrestrials living amongst us who have knowledge from when they were handing out the secrets of their advanced technology to past civilisations?
Another conspiracy theory. No doubt some on here will tell us it is true and mock those who don't believe. http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/720359/Vladimir-Putin-Donald-Trump-team-up-tell-world-Planet-X
Can you actually 'sail off' in a U Boat ? Shirley for that to be possible it would have to have erm a sail, like a Clipper. Having said that sailors don't have sails. I wonder what the difference is between a seaman and a sailor. Perhaps Ted Heath could tell us ? Stop.
Weird when an intellectual discussion on historical or mythical figures is banned but direct personal abuse and profanity is perfectly acceptable. That's progress for you.
http://yournewswire.com/people-with-rhesus-negative-blood-may-be-aliens/ Another very strange one, not sure what it means for the even weirder aliens are jews dressed up "theory".
The Marshall Aid Plan was not a loan. Stop making a clown of yourself, even though you are a daft as and not scarey one.
