The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
It was the one used by many of the commonwealth people interviewed.
It has more substance than the lazy 'racist brexiters' bleat from the remoanians.
Surely if you're a xenophobe you go for the option which would potentially lead to no foreigners entering the country freely.
It's not a lazy bleat at all. Immigration has been proven to be the key "concern" for a lot of people in deciding which way to vote. Hate crimes are on the up.
So a shift in opinion of 1% then and taken only a month after the vote and prior to the hard Brexit message spouted at last weeks Tory conference. As I said to ignore the fact that Brexit could potentially tip the balance in favour of independence is a nonsense - nothing's happened yet remember
With exactly the same bullshit argument you posted before and exactly what I'd already said you thick ****I've answered for myself without your peculiar slant. ta.
'Allegations' of hate crime allegedly were. Not too many seem to have had that much substance, and a fair few were found to be nonsense.
The bleat about racism is simply that, a lazy bleat to boot. Having control over the borders and immigration is racist, no matter which of the many attempted definitions you try to apply to it.
At least Pete and Kustard are openly bigoted. You're such a coward that you try to hide it. You'll never be allowed into the inner circle
You dopey bigoted simpleton
So a shift in opinion of 1% then and taken only a month after the vote and prior to the hard Brexit message spouted at last weeks Tory conference. As I said to ignore the fact that Brexit could potentially tip the balance in favour of independence is a nonsense - nothing's happened yet remember
It's true noyjing of substance has happened regarding initiating brexit. The SNP know the score, it's why Jimmy Krankie's gone quiet.
With exactly the same bullshit argument you posted before and exactly what I'd already said you thick ****
No it isn't you strawman building ****er.
This is too deluded to bother with in all honesty. It almost makes the England match appealing.
Hahaha you're swinging like a drunk trampNo it isn't you strawman building ****er.
You argued for pages that Remain was the more racist vote, when confronted with the fact that a decent proportion of the leave vote was based on xenophobia and good old fashioned racism
That was after you spent pages denying that abusing whites could be racist
You transparent brainless prick
Tell it to the commonwealth people, and all the others negatively affected.
You'll find exceptions within those communities, but given I'm advocating a policy that's quite liable to result in more visibly ethnic people coming to the UK. it's amusing to be labelled as a racist because of it.
I prefer us to stand on our own two feet and make our own laws.
Other people want to accept being bossed about by people in Brussels.
Last edited:
Tell it to the commonwealth people, and all the others negatively affected.
You'll find exceptions within those communities, but given I'm advocating a policy that's quite liable to result in more visibly ethnic people coming to the UK. it's amusing to be labelled as a racist because of it.
If that proves to be the case it's an irony for those who voted Leave for xenophobic reasons. To label Leave as some sort of victory for multiculturalism is, simply, delusion.
None of which answers my initial question of why it's a fact that an narrow majority for Remain would have led us to a European superstate.
Don't forget that you also wanted rid of the Romanians fatso.
I bet they know the difference between to, two and too. They have top grades.
- Status