Just looked it up it was Argentina not Brazil! The house definitely housed someone who had very high security demands! Bunkers, escape tunnels, look out posts!
Somebody better at finance than me will be able to answer this, but why did it take nearly half a century for them to be totally liquidated? Was it because of other big companies like Bayer being involved?
Google it. Some interesting reading on the subject. Local heroes Siemens hands were far from clean during the Third Reich.
Those disgusting german companies making money out of war, glad to to say we are now a far more civilised society where that could never go on erm......
You do spout irrelevant tripe. Can't think of any companies of ours who are helping construct camps to wipe out millions people or profiting from slave labour whilst they are worked to death.
Of course its all tripe nobody ever makes money from war do they? Was auschwitz consructed to wipe out millions? How did all the firms doing work for the german army know of the plans, i was always led to believe it was a secret.
The German army weren't involved in the building of Auschwitz. Why do you think it was constructed? And Treblinka, Sobibor etc?Though technically Auschwitz was a camp built to profit from slave labour, the killing was done at .Birkenau of those not considered fit enough to work. Though how secret it was with people involved in its construction, firms tendering to build crematoria capable of dealing with thousands of corpses (why did they think these would be necessary?), firms asked to supply large amounts of zyklon-b, railway drivers etc is debatable.
So are you saying everyone knew? When I was at auschwitz I only saw ordinary crematoria, are they capable of dealing with thousands of corpses or did they have different ones elsewhere?
Who said EVERYONE knew? Auschwitz/Birkenau was only operating as an extermination centre for three years. Over a million died there. You work out how many they had to deal with on a daily basis. Though in the end they couldn't cope and resorted to enormous pyres. Suggest you read a hit on the subject instead of looking at alternative narratives and swallowing them whole. You would have thought access to information through the internet would have made people more aware of things, not less.
Crikey I ask a couple of questions about what you have posted and you get all defensive and attack my knowledge. Why is that? It would be useful if you could tell me what alternative narratives i have swallowed whole.
Norman Finkelstein writes some interesting stuff on the subject. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Finkelstein
I wasn't getting all defensive. And I wasn't attacking your knowledge. I was pointing out your lack of it. Alternative narratives are what people use to describe half-baked nonsense. Such as Hitler invading Poland as a defensive measure, acceptable under English law.
Lol you really are a funny one, attacking other peoples knowledge whilst writing gibberish yourself, did you actually read back that first line before you posted it. Despite you still not telling me what alternative narrative you believe I have swallowed whole, your view of alternative/ counter narratives is clearly obvious and is as scary as it is hilarious. However, that statement does substantiate a post I made over a week ago where i said this to you "you have been told what to think and seem determined to stick to it".
