I forget I don't post here much. I normally read and just go "huh". I only post when I feel I can give a unique insight.
I think as someone has suggested, The Telegraph are going to name managers (10) who have been taking bungs, backhanders.... maybe just maybe DCFC have got wind of something..?
Probably. I've lost the will with City a bit in recent years, I still go every week but it's not the same. Maybe it's the Allams, maybe it's because I'm a responsible adult instead of a pissed off student with too much time on his hands. Who knows. I see Derby are 2-0 up without this horrendous ****house in charge anyway. Amazing how many teams improve when he leaves.
Silly bastard Agro( City Man) defends Pearson and bleats about how managers should only be judged on results. Derby bin him off after an abysmal start and low and behold they're winning. Oh the irony.
A shame all their clubs won't have points deducted. We could stay up easily in that case if enough were deducted.
Feel a bit sorry for Pearson. He's assembled a decent squad at Derby. Just 2 or 3 strikers short of being competitive.
I wonder if managers should have a shelf life... NP, SB........ need putting out to pasture. as soon as they get a grey hair, they should drop a division
You can't tell me you honestly think a team can get promoted from the championship with any less than 9 strikers?