Off Topic Conspiracy Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'm genuinely surprised at you Dutch. There's nothing there to merit any further question, just an invite to feed the monster. Not having a dig, just surprised; I'll read on and may apologise later, but time's tight.

I think we're on the same wavelength, I've perhaps worded it wrong.
 
From the top 5 channel...

You must log in or register to see media

The evidence of demolition charges is there at 10.43. The support beam cut at 45 degrees by the charge.
Lucky Larry at 12.45 admitting they demolished building 7.
 
The evidence of demolition charges is there at 10.43. The support beam cut at 45 degrees by the charge.
Lucky Larry at 12.45 admitting they demolished building 7.

Could that beam have been cut after the collapse as part of the process of making the area safe?
 
Could that beam have been cut after the collapse as part of the process of making the area safe?
Exactly my thoughts at the time until I heard a demolition guy saying they almost always cut square because there's less material to cut through than if cut at an angle. Any pieces they cut are held in place by a crane ready to be removed at the right time. Demolition charges are not placed square because there's a big risk the beam although cut would just sit on top. With a diagonal charge it should 'slide' off apparently.
 
'
Worrying thing is that there are some on here who will believe he did.
I think conspiracy theorists just want to believe, just because it's more interesting that way.

I want to believe in ghosts. I miss being scared of ghosty things likes I was when I was a kid.

Horror films aren't worth watching for me these days.