I'm not to sure about the video images, but it's good to hear Stephen Hawkings daughter's finding work.
The thing about the cars is that she seems to be claiming they didn't 'catch fire' in the normal sense. Her reasoning ; there is paper, trees , shop fronts etc that are in close proximity to the cars that are unaffected. Also it's either the front or the back of the car that has been affected and the other half remain relatively unscathed implying that where there is an electrical insulator or a gap in the body work doors to front wings etc the circuit is broken and hence the damage stops abruptly. I'm not saying I'm convinced only that it is a very strange phenomenom. Some of her interviews are a bit amateurish but putting that aside one point stands out, the nearby street lights , traffic lights and shop fronts are earthed but cars on rubber tyres aren't. I'll have a look for a vid.
The point that raises though, is do the CIA generate fake conspiracy theories, so that real conspiracies get dismissed and ridiculed? There is no doubt at all that groups like the CIA have conspired with various 'enemies' for different reasons such as in South America, Afghanistan and Sicily, and their black ops budget is bigger than the budget of many nations. Are people ridiculing conspiracies, victims of a conspiracy?
Hillary is severely ill , her face is bloated (as if she has been prescribed steriods). It's a lot more than pneumonia. If it was just pneumonia her team have had plenty of opportunity to come out and say so in the preceding weeks.
Some conspiracies are obviously genuine, things have been covered up over the years, so I don't think they need to fake them. Particularly when they've got people like Dr Judy to do it for them. The CIA being responsible for AIDS isn't even the most ridiculous theory posted on this thread.
i visited ground zero and I went into the memorial building! There's massive steel structures and the one thing that struck me was how could a plane have brought this down? Ok maybe & it's a big maybe? If the planes had struck the bottom of the buildings it could have toppled them? But for them to hit above half way and for them to implode like they did???
I'm sure I saw a clip of her on CNN leaning up against one corner coughing after a *** break. It was her all along
Deary me. Propaganda, information control, disinformation and lying are admitted tactics of governments the world over. I have seen instances where lies are required to protect sources, people, or ongoing investigations. 9/11 was a genuine attack. The conspiracy evidence is fuelled by non important academics who want a minute of fame and who write incompetent papers with illogical conclusions. And school kids who get sucked into the mystery and half truths. If we wanted an excuse to invade anywhere, any government could do it without resorting to extreme loss of life and a world changing terrorist victory event. Some dodgy Info is usually enough. The real lies are so well hidden you don't see them. This one isn't a lie! EDIT: missile hitting the pentagon? If there was a contingency for what to do in a breach, where sensitive equipment or papers may be open to professional "looters", maybe a self initiated destruction maybe an option, like a burn after reading. The catalyst would always be an attack. You don't shoot your own Intel HQ. FFS. Seriously. The thing was annihilated by a loon in a plane. End of.
Can we start a new conspiracy on here. The guy who attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan has just been released from prison into the care of his mother (she must be near 100 years old) Is he going to do for one of the candidates?
Bin Laden said his knowledge of structures due to his background of being an architect and his families engineering firm made him realise the Twin Towers could be made to collapse. Of course he may have been part of the conspiracy with the CIA, and no doubt Israel Which was the reason they rubbed him out -to protect the secret. On the other hand,planes were flown into the Twin Towers and they collapsed.
