The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that's fair comment, the speed of immigration created pressures, prejudice and resentment by many.
Poland with a population of 40 million was always going to cause more tension than the other much smaller countries of eastern Europe.
When the EU/EEC was smaller there wasn't so much of a problem but when they expanded the EU to it's present size the introduction of the Euro and allowing the continuation of freedom of movement was always going to cause massive problems.
 
Yes, you said Mervyn King was untrustworthy yet you gave as an example something that didn't relate to untrustworthiness.
Can't be relied upon? He had a job and he totally ****ed it up in an almost unimaginable fashion.
Would you rely on him to predict what's going to happen with the economy in the future?
You seem to be totally confused about England and the UK and the Queen and the House of Lords relationship with them.
You seem to struggle with any kind of thought process.
Do you ever support anything that you saw with anything? You merely state crap and hope that people let it pass.
If you're going to tell me that I'm wrong about something, then try explaining why you believe that's so.
Stop spouting bollocks and write something with a bit of ****ing substance.
 
May was one of the frontrunners from the start. Hardly a shock winner.
Your reluctance to accept when you've been proven totally wrong is noted, though.
So you think that somebody who was odds on and would almost certainly go through to the final vote with the support of the vast majority of Conservative Party members wouldn't win? Johnson only lost out because of Gove. Otherwise he would have been in the final two and become Prime Minister.
 
Remain people wanted to stay in a corrupt undemocratic failed organisation. When sensible people voted to leave the corrupt undemocratic failed organisation the Remain people say that it's not their fault. It's the fault of the people who voted Leave. Vaz says: "It's not my fault. It's the people who exposed my behaviour."

And your trying to link his indiscretions to being a 'remainer' are barmy!

Like most of everything else you post!
 
Can't be relied upon? He had a job and he totally ****ed it up in an almost unimaginable fashion.
Would you rely on him to predict what's going to happen with the economy in the future?

Do you ever support anything that you saw with anything? You merely state crap and hope that people let it pass.
If you're going to tell me that I'm wrong about something, then try explaining why you believe that's so.
Stop spouting bollocks and write something with a bit of ****ing substance.
You don't seem to understand the definition of untrustworthy. I even provided it for you.
The House of Lords and the Queen both have positions relating to the UK not England. England is part of the UK.
It's a bit like me being from Hull and living in London and you trying to link me to Cornwall. It's total nonsense.
 
It's the point at which I've decided his comments no longer deserve a response.

Coming from someone who got his qualification at a poly it is absolutely ridiculous so see this level of arrogance.
I got my degree in accountancy from the first institution in England to offer a degree in Accountancy. That was when degrees were worth getting and didn't lead to a job at McDonalds.
 
So you think that somebody who was odds on and would almost certainly go through to the final vote with the support of the vast majority of Conservative Party members wouldn't win? Johnson only lost out because of Gove. Otherwise he would have been in the final two and become Prime Minister.
Johnson's got a rather dodgy history and had just done a 180 on his own party, so it was hardly a shock when he got stitched up.
If it wasn't Gove, then it would probably have been something else. There were lots of people waiting to stick the knife in.
You don't seem to understand the definition of untrustworthy. I even provided it for you.
The House of Lords and the Queen both have positions relating to the UK not England. England is part of the UK.
It's a bit like me being from Hull and living in London and you trying to link me to Cornwall. It's total nonsense.
I quoted the meaning in my answer, you dimwit.
The Queen is the ****ing monarch of England, amongst other titles.
To claim that she doesn't have a position relating to the country is utterly stupid.

I didn't try to link you to Cornwall, either. Do you have trouble with reading comprehension?
Perhaps this is why you believe that people in this country have a poor education? You use your own as an example.
 
Perhaps. I can only base my opinion on your posts and failed predictions on here.

I base mine entirely on your talking unsupportable rubbish and then desperately trying to defend the indefensible.

And, most of what I said would happen, did. Things are now in limbo until where this Brexit nonsense goes next is far clearer.
 
I would keep your imagination in check if I was you. You and Keith Vaz may be accused of having more in common than being Remain supporters.
You really don't like the gays, do you Pete? UKIP keeping up it's non-bigot image well, as usual.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.