It did, I'm a lazy sod when it comes to typing, I only type half a word and the phone knows what I want to say. I'm not really bothered about going back and correcting it, nobody important is going to pull me up on it.
Great news that the bid for Hernandez was turned down if it's true, a real statement of intent from the new owners.
Never, repeat never let autocorrect send your messages... http://www.damnyouautocorrect.com/13603/the-25-funniest-autocorrects-of-dyacs-first-year/
If we must descend into this juvenile slanging style, I will counter with 'your response seems humourless and oversensitive'. That said, I will say you seem an educated possibly even intelligent chap and my pulling you up about 'relevent' was just joshing. Although I think some of the bad feeling on here stems from people not having the articulacy to put their point across adequately to win their argument. I note you distort the meaning of my previous posts in order to make them seem extreme and outlandish. There seems little point in having the same old discussion again, unless you have a fresh angle.
I have to agree with the comments here about his value to us - his goals could well be the difference between survival and relegation, a feat worth a lot more than 20m. If it was July, however, I think I would have taken the money. It does tell me that the consortium now have more of a stake in transfers than the Allams, if they still had autonomy they would have seen £ signs and ran.
That's not a good enough response. We will have this discussion a billion times over if that's what it takes. So, make yourself a brew, settle down and answer the questions.
