Transfer Rumours 2016/17 City Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
tigerscanada said:
How do you know that the price is set in stone ? Where do you get that from ? Where is it published ? Have you insider knowledge of from their legal and/or financial advisor team ? You haven't a clue have you ?
Click to expand...

OLM has said the heads of agreement has been signed and a deposit paid?
 
Have to say that while Jak has played well this season and the end of last for me Marshall is an upgrade on all of the keepers we have
 
tigerscanada said:
How do you know that the price is set in stone ? Where do you get that from ? Where is it published ? Have you insider knowledge of from their legal and/or financial advisor team ? You haven't a clue have you ?
Click to expand...
I would expect there's a number agreed but if various things happen - eg. repayment of part of director's loan - it could change.
 
originallambrettaman said:
I think there's some concern that McGregor's issues may continue and that Kuciak isn't good enough, one of them will probably go out on loan or be sold in January.
Click to expand...

I can't get the logic behind Kuciak. We wanted players to give us a bit of so,etching extra and Bruce spent all of what little we had on a ****ing goalkeeper who doesn't play.

Must have been some sort of backhanders involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
tigerscanada said:
What's in the agreement ? Any conditions ?
Click to expand...

I would assume the agreement is to pay a certain price unless unexpected issues come up. The value of incoming players is pretty much no chance to be one of those considering the Dais are part of the valuation process. <doh>
 
Bum_Chinned_Crab said:
Just on this Marshall thing, what do we think the thinking is? He's a good keeper but we've already got 2 very senior keepers plus an obvious 3rd choice and then an additional obvious prospect as 4th choice. Surely we can't be looking to add to that and instead are moving one on. McGregor to go when fit?

And if Marshall does sign, it's Phelan's first big test. Dropping The Jak would be unfair beyond belief.
Click to expand...

I suspect our 3 keepers going forwards will be Jak, Marshall and Kuciak.

Have we missed McGregor? No.

I also think a lengthy absence for a keeper due to back injury is never a good indication.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerrev and CANADATIGER
Hull City AFC (GLP) said:
I suspect our 3 keepers going forwards will be Jak, Marshall and Kuciak.

Have we missed McGregor? No.

I also think a lengthy absence for a keeper due to back injury is never a good indication.
Click to expand...
Jak has epitomised the spirit and belief of the whole team. Even if Gregor had been fit now he'd have to wait now and it strikes me as each week goes by Jak improves more. At one time, i'm sure the defensive line would crap themselves that he was behind them. Not now. Brilliant the way he involves the supporters too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gtigerbackin hull, look_back_in_amber, CANADATIGER and 3 others
SydneyTiger14 said:
I would assume the agreement is to pay a certain price unless unexpected issues come up. The value of incoming players is pretty much no chance to be one of those considering the Dais are part of the valuation process. <doh>
Click to expand...
OK. How did they value the club 2-4-8 weeks ago ( or whenever the accepted offer took place) ? When was this offer "set in stone" ? 4 injuries later, a depleted 1st team squad, 6 (unexpected ) pts in the bag ! It's changed. The value of the club has changed (up or down depending on the weighting of the variables and the interpretation of the two parties involved). You don't believe it has changed. I do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
Anyone picked up on the Jonathon Kodjia rumours..£14m with City and Derby after his sig..He didn't play yesterday which seems to suggest a deal is imminent.
 
Duffens_Briefs said:
Anyone picked up on the Jonathon Kodjia rumours..£14m with City and Derby after his sig..He didn't play yesterday which seems to suggest a deal is imminent.
Click to expand...

Yeah would be interesting, has kind of come out of left field. I suspect he's going to Derby and his agent is just trying to bump up his contract with them but who knows?

With Phelan saying we have had a few bids accepted it's easy for agents to fabricate us having bids accepted for their players.
 
Just seen Rodriguez scored for Southampton yesterday. Is that loan deal dead in the water now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back