The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pete, you're a moron!

You know absolutely **** all about my life, yet you seem to think you do.

I know what's real! What's real is you're an idiot!...
Well you brag about your "internet wealth" but when I ask to see a suitably redacted bank statement you refuse. The only reason must be that you can't justify your lies.
 
Well you brag about your "internet wealth" but when I ask to see a suitably redacted bank statement you refuse. The only reason must be that you can't justify your lies.
Can I see your bank statement Pete?

Do you disbelieve anyone and everyone who intimates that they've done a bit better than being a pensioner, book keeper, slum landlord?
 
Well you brag about your "internet wealth" but when I ask to see a suitably redacted bank statement you refuse. The only reason must be that you can't justify your lies.

I really don't know why I'm replying to this idiocy, but for the last time. Here goes.

WTF is internet wealth? What are you babbling on about? I'm comfortably off, thank you.

Am I going to publish bank statements on an Internet forum? You must be ****ing kidding me? Seriously?
 
I really don't know why I'm replying to this idiocy, but for the last time. Here goes.

WTF is internet wealth? What are you babbling on about? I'm comfortably off, thank you.

Am I going to publish bank statements on an Internet forum? You must be ****ing kidding me? Seriously?
Do you know what redacted means?
 
Pete you previously bragged about how much your house was worth as it had two kitchens and several shower rooms. How do we know that you haven't remortgaged it up to the maximum? Please provide redacted statements to show that you either own the slum outright or that you have a limited mortgage(s) on it. Thanks.
 
I really don't know why I'm replying to this idiocy, but for the last time. Here goes.

WTF is internet wealth? What are you babbling on about? I'm comfortably off, thank you.

Am I going to publish bank statements on an Internet forum? You must be ****ing kidding me? Seriously?
"internet wealth" is something an inadequate person brags about when he doesn't have any real wealth.
There would be no problem publishing bank statements on an internet forum if the account name, address, sort code and account number were redacted. These bank statements would be able to indicate whether the individual had any wealth or income to speak of. I was in an estate agents once and somebody wanted to buy a house for £400k. They were asked how could they afford the house. They produced a bank statement with a balance of £500k. It's not difficult to understand the concept.
Only somebody who only has "internet wealth" would brag about it but claim not to understand the point of proving it.
 
"internet wealth" is something an inadequate person brags about when he doesn't have any real wealth.
There would be no problem publishing bank statements on an internet forum if the account name, address, sort code and account number were redacted. These bank statements would be able to indicate whether the individual had any wealth or income to speak of. I was in an estate agents once and somebody wanted to buy a house for £400k. They were asked how could they afford the house. They produced a bank statement with a balance of £500k. It's not difficult to understand the concept.
Only somebody who only has "internet wealth" would brag about it but claim not to understand the point of proving it.

Ok, for the very last time, and only because you're supposedly an accountant?

Do you seriously think that I keep the bulk of my wealth in bank accounts?? Why would I do that? Maybe you do, as you're so sensible! The money I have is invested, Pete, in property, and other assets. Much of it is run from Malta.

Surely, as an accountant, you know that's sensible?....

Now, I'm trying to watch the football!....
 
"internet wealth" is something an inadequate person brags about when he doesn't have any real wealth.
There would be no problem publishing bank statements on an internet forum if the account name, address, sort code and account number were redacted. These bank statements would be able to indicate whether the individual had any wealth or income to speak of. I was in an estate agents once and somebody wanted to buy a house for £400k. They were asked how could they afford the house. They produced a bank statement with a balance of £500k. It's not difficult to understand the concept.
Only somebody who only has "internet wealth" would brag about it but claim not to understand the point of proving it.
Mortgage statements please Pete.

Do you advise your book keeping clients to publish their, redacted, company accounts on football forums? It might explain why you've been wearing the same pair of tracky bottoms for a decade.
 
Ok, for the very last time, and only because you're supposedly an accountant?

Do you seriously think that I keep the bulk of my wealth in bank accounts?? Why would I do that? Maybe you do, as you're so sensible! The money I have is invested, Pete, in property, and other assets. Much of it is run from Malta.

Surely, as an accountant, you know that's sensible?....

Now, I'm trying to watch the football!....
Same applies. You'll have statements which can corroborate that. Scan, redact and publish, please.
 
No, "internet wealth" is what he made up. He likes to brag about it. If you haven't noticed you must have serious comprehension issues.
All he's ever said is that despite getting divorced twice he managed to retire to Spain early and is financially comfortable. Why does that piss you off so much?
 
No, "internet wealth" is what he made up. He likes to brag about it. If you haven't noticed you must have serious comprehension issues.

You're spot on Pete. It was as funny as ****. He made a right arse of himself, so his wee buddies came to his defence and tried to make out they were internet detectives because they'd followed your signature, and then, as an attempt to hide his blushes tried to spin it as though you were the one boasting.


They fall back on it when their 'expert opinion' is getting laughed out of the thread.
<laugh>
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.