So you didn't give a **** about what they were doing to the club and its supporters until it affected you personally?
I never said I wasn't a ****, ****
So you didn't give a **** about what they were doing to the club and its supporters until it affected you personally?
I never said I wasn't a ****, ****
Link?
Come on OLM, don't beat about the bush, prove I have ever said anything of the sort.
In my position as a board member, I have supported and fully support the view that the OSC has to do what it does best, putting on events, providing information for supporters, making matchdays enjoyable and raising money for charities. To do that we rely on the support of the club. Everyone knows that is the position and no matter who owns the club, it will not change.
The OSC is continuing to do what it is good at, raising money for charity. Last night our Quiz Night team took the sum raised to £398.00 for CRY our main charity. We are busy planning events and preparing our next edition of Tigermag. We are continuing to improve our social media services and we are always working on new projects.
Any organisation that wishes to work with the club will have to do the same as us. New owners will expect exactly the same from any organisation that they work with.
For what it is worth, I believe in total supporter ownership of football clubs, I do not believe that anyone individual should have the right to own a club. I fully support and always have supported fans shareholdings and seats on the board of football clubs. I am also aware that whist full supporter ownership is a great ideal, it is often impractical. A supporters group that is neutered by a lack of a relationship with the club has little to offer its members.

The OSC's charity work is commendable.
Good luck with it.![]()
You only have to read this forum every day to see how many soft and complacent fans we have. There are the ones that won't tolerate any discussion about tactics, quibble about protests, ones going about not 'panicking' when this is the worst situation we have been in for at least 5 years or more. The ones saying the owner could change the name without any good reason at all.Too many 'I'm alright Jack' fans by far but I'm proud of the majority who won't take this kind of **** and protested against the owners, are protesting still in any way they can, and it won't be long I'm sure a new owner is in to restore the proud name and reputation of Hull City. Stand up for what you believe inI just took for granted the assumption that when something as daft as the name change came up, that it would be roundly rejected and mocked by Hull City's support and never heard of again.
I remember being astounded that it was not, then angry and then exceedingly disappointed. I really thought Hull people would not give this the time of day.
How wrong I was.
Never been the same since.
I don't think anyone can really still support the Allam clan in any meaningful way, but there are still some on here (and elsewhere) who will do anything to avoid agreeing with people they view as hooligans and trouble-causers. They'll disagree til the cows come home.
Oh no. Cows.