You'd rather us be in for players like Ibe, Van Persie & Valdes, but then doing absolutely nothing? Oh.
Hello mate

You're a gangrenous sack of ****e that needs removing from this board.
Tah.
You'd rather us be in for players like Ibe, Van Persie & Valdes, but then doing absolutely nothing? Oh.

Thank you. You come across as cheerful as your avatar. Have a nice day!Hello mate
You're a gangrenous sack of ****e that needs removing from this board.
Tah.
Yep. Its quite sad some 70 year old bloke is deliberately trying to be annoying on a City forum for attention.Hello mate
You're a gangrenous sack of ****e that needs removing from this board.
Tah.
You come across as a total melt.Thank you. You come across as cheerful as your avatar. Have a nice day!
Interesting. I though Waggy was the fastest player over 3 yards I ever saw...he scored a shed-load as a result.Much like Waggy.
I would say, technically, he was quick -- ridiculously quick -- rather than fast. Which is probably the same as you're saying. For me, his ability to completely and instantly control a ball pinged in from any direction, at any speed, was his key asset. Like many of us on here, I've had countless arguments with people who never had the privilege of seeing him in his heyday. I tell 'em he's the best player I ever saw, and they just don't believe it.Interesting. I though Waggy was the fastest player over 3 yards I ever saw...he scored a shed-load as a result.
Same thing. His speed of thought, anticipation & mobility in tight situations was like lightening. Puskas was similar.I would say, technically, he was quick -- ridiculously quick -- rather than fast. Which is probably the same as you're saying. For me, his ability to completely and instantly control a ball pinged in from any direction, at any speed, was his key asset. Like many of us on here, I've had countless arguments with people who never had the privilege of seeing him in his heyday. I tell 'em he's the best player I ever saw, and they just don't believe it.
By a country mile. Dont think we could buy what Waggy had for £20mI would say, technically, he was quick -- ridiculously quick -- rather than fast. Which is probably the same as you're saying. For me, his ability to completely and instantly control a ball pinged in from any direction, at any speed, was his key asset. Like many of us on here, I've had countless arguments with people who never had the privilege of seeing him in his heyday. I tell 'em he's the best player I ever saw, and they just don't believe it.
I see a lot of similarities in Messi, and Messi would cost a few bob more than £20m. I think it was Clough (correct me if I'm wrong) who wanted Waggy and Chillo, but City turned the offer down; can't remember how much the offer was.By a country mile. Dont think we could buy what Waggy had for £20m
Cloughie did put in an offer for both. At the time I heard Waggy wanted to be a big fish in a small pond (he was having a ball), so told Britton he'd rather not move. It's a big shame in some ways, I believe both he & Chilton may well have become England players had they moved.I see a lot of similarities in Messi, and Messi would cost a few bob more than £20m. I think it was Clough (correct me if I'm wrong) who wanted Waggy and Chillo, but City turned the offer down; can't remember how much the offer was.
That makes sense. Waggy always looked like he was enjoying himself and, I believe, still lives in the same area -- enjoying free pints whenever he is recognized -- he actually hasn't changed much in appearance, and still has a similar gut. Also, his wishing to stay may well have been related to the fact that City at that time always looked absolute certainties for promotion ... plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.Cloughie did put in an offer for both. At the time I heard Waggy wanted to be a big fish in a small pond (he was having a ball), so told Britton he'd rather not move. It's a big shame in some ways, I believe both he & Chilton may well have become England players had they moved.
When I insisted on calling our cat Wagstaff, my wife asked "Why would you want to name an animal after a Shakespearean character ?".That makes sense. Waggy always looked like he was enjoying himself and, I believe, still lives in the same area -- enjoying free pints whenever he is recognized -- he actually hasn't changed much in appearance, and still has a similar gut. Also, his wishing to stay may well have been related to the fact that City at that time always looked absolute certainties for promotion ... plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
As for your last sentence ... ab-so-frickin-lutely YES. It would have made the aforesaid discussions with the young and unknowing so much more satisfying. Oh well.
Ha! That's genuinely funny! Did you have a hamster called McSeveny?When I insisted on calling our cat Wagstaff, my wife asked "Why would you want to name an animal after a Shakespearean character ?".
She didn't quiz me at all when we named our dog Chilton.
Funny that.
Wee John McSeveny - poor bugger got a fair bit of stick from the crowd at times. Should have called my budgies Nobby & Charlie - after Dougie Clarke and Charlie Crickmore. Where the hell as all that time gone to ?Ha! That's genuinely funny! Did you have a hamster called McSeveny?
Very, very scary, innit? That was certainly a team of characters! Ray Henderson featured a lot, also Simmo, Jarvis, Swanny, Kekkers, Dirty Jock, Milner, and others that I may remember when I'm asleep! Those were the days, my friend, I thought they'd never end ... Then I grew up ... or not.Wee John McSeveny - poor bugger got a fair bit of stick from the crowd at times. Should have called my budgies Nobby & Charlie - after Dougie Clarke and Charlie Crickmore. Where the hell as all that time gone to ?